What happens to wavelength and frequency when a wave changes velocity

AI Thread Summary
When an electromagnetic wave enters a denser medium, its velocity decreases, leading to a change in wavelength while the frequency remains constant. This means that the wave gets compressed as it enters the denser medium. The index of refraction can be used to mathematically express the relationship between wavelength and velocity. A graphical representation shows that the initial part of the wave slows down, causing the waves to bunch up. Understanding these concepts visually can enhance comprehension before applying mathematical verification.
HorseBox
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
When an EM wave goes into say a denser medium and its velocity is decreased how does its wavelength and frequency change? I read that the frequency remains constant but the wavelength changes. Is this true? If so does that mean the wave gets compressed when it enters a denser medium. Does the amplitude decrease too?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The index of refraction specifically states the change in wave-length for a em-wave.

n=\frac{\lambda}{\lambda_{n}}

and the relation for velocity-a medium- and light is

n=\frac{c}{v}

that gives a simple answer to your question. does it help?
 
Or if you wish to think of it "graphically" then imagine a wave heading into an object, say glass at a specific angle. What happens to the first part of the wave that hits the glass?... you can think of it like the first part of the wave gets slowed down, before the other part catches up. Now draw this, and you'll notice that the waves tend to get bunch up. Now make deductions based on the fact that you know the velocity has decreased.
 
Ah yeah that explains it thanks. I do like to understand things visually first then use the mathematical approach to verify my understanding and unravel things I wouldn't have spotted.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top