What happens when capacitors are reconnected?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Calpalned
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Capacitors
AI Thread Summary
When two charged capacitors are disconnected from a battery, they maintain their charge distribution until reconnected. The confusion arises from the change in charge configuration when the connectors are swapped between the capacitors. This swapping can create a scenario where positive and negative charges are redistributed, but it is a natural consequence of the reconnection process. According to Kirchhoff's loop rule, the charge distribution must satisfy equilibrium conditions, meaning that no additional charge flows once the battery is removed. Understanding these principles clarifies the behavior of capacitors during reconnection.
Calpalned
Messages
297
Reaction score
6
In an example from my textbook, two capacitors are fully charged and then disconnected from the battery. (The full text is on the bottom of the thread).
Screenshot (71).png

Initially, the positive charge is on top, negative on the bottom.
Screenshot (72).png

How did this occur? This is the part that I don't understand. Originally the top had two positive charges and now it has both positive and negative. Is this natural, or was something done during the re-connection?
Screenshot (70).png

So the charges move back to the same configuration as in (A) - positive on top, negative on the bottom. This makes sense. Once again, I don't understand part B, because part B doesn't seem to fit the sequence. A can go to C, but B doesn't fit.

Below is the full example, if it helps
Screenshot (73).png

Thank you.
 
  • Like
Likes kbr2020
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks like C2 is simply "turned around" between the two first diagrams, i.e. the connectors between C1 and C2 are swapped in the second diagram compared to the first.
 
  • Like
Likes davenn
Calpalned said:
How did this occur? This is the part that I don't understand. Originally the top had two positive charges and now it has both positive and negative. Is this natural, or was something done during the re-connection?
Read the second sentence of the first paragraph of the question. Carefully.
 
  • Like
Likes davenn
Filip Larsen said:
Looks like C2 is simply "turned around" between the two first diagrams, i.e. the connectors between C1 and C2 are swapped in the second diagram compared to the first.

Yes

DaleSpam said:
Read the second sentence of the first paragraph of the question. Carefully.

and yes :smile:
 
CrazyNinja said:
But even otherwise, if the battery was disconnected and the capacitors weren't the charge distribution would still be as shown in (b). It has to be to satisfy kirchhoffs loop rule. No reconnection is required, charge will flow automatically.

You may want to re-think that. The removal of the battery leaves the system in the state shown at (a). It is already in equilibrium and no charge will flow.
 
jbriggs444 said:
You may want to re-think that. The removal of the battery leaves the system in the state shown at (a). It is already in equilibrium and no charge will flow.

Yeah it is. Sorry for that. I'll jus delete the previous post. Thanks!
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top