B What Happens When Light Approaches a Black Hole?

complete_noob
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
what happens to light as it approaches a black whole
Hello I am not a physics student and i don't know anything about science, but i was curious if someone could tell me about what happens when light approaches a black hole i have heard that nothing goes faster than light but i have also heard that black holes can suck in light, combined with the fact that if a person was to enter a black whole whatever was clossest would move towards the center faster than whatever was far away does this not affect light the same way because it can't move faster than it already is? so does the light just turn and head towards the black hole at the same speed with no loss of speed and no increase in speed? and does this mean that light has mass? because how can it affect something with no mass?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Defining speed in relativity is a somewhat tricky thing. Local measurements will always have light going at the same speed and everything else going slower. Remote measurements can give almost anything as a speed - it depends how you choose to define "space" and "time" in spacetime. The key fact is that, however you define speed, nothing ever overtakes a light pulse in vacuum under any circumstances.

Light does not have mass. Relativity models gravity as the curvature of spacetime - everything is affected, with mass or without. Light paths are curved towards the black hole, just like everything else (or at least the path through space is curved - the path through spacetime is straight).
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and Nugatory
very cool thanks for explaining it to me
 
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
Abstract The gravitational-wave signal GW250114 was observed by the two LIGO detectors with a network matched-filter signal-to-noise ratio of 80. The signal was emitted by the coalescence of two black holes with near-equal masses ## m_1=33.6_{-0.8}^{+1.2} M_{⊙} ## and ## m_2=32.2_{-1. 3}^{+0.8} M_{⊙}##, and small spins ##\chi_{1,2}\leq 0.26 ## (90% credibility) and negligible eccentricity ##e⁢\leq 0.03.## Postmerger data excluding the peak region are consistent with the dominant quadrupolar...

Similar threads

Replies
22
Views
1K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
31
Views
517
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
40
Views
3K
Replies
46
Views
7K
Back
Top