What Forces Bind Quarks Within Particles?

  • Thread starter Thread starter fredreload
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quark
AI Thread Summary
Quarks are considered fundamental particles, meaning there is no force that "holds them together" as they are not composed of smaller constituents. The concept of a minimum distance in the universe, such as the Planck length, remains speculative and unproven, with current measurements unable to detect anything below approximately 10^20 Planck lengths. The discussion suggests that the nature of quarks and their interactions may be inherently elusive, leading to the conclusion that definitive answers about their binding forces may never be achieved. Overall, the topic highlights the complexities and limitations of our understanding of particle physics. The quest to understand quark interactions continues to challenge scientific inquiry.
fredreload
Messages
250
Reaction score
6
What holds a quark together? Like the boundary force of this elementary particle? How do you create one?

This thing is like minimum distance, it's never getting an answer.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Quarks are currently taken to be fundamental particles, so there is no "holds them together"

If by minimum distance, you mean the smallest possible distance in the universe, there are no indication that there is such a thing or any reason for there to be such a thing. It IS likely that we will never be able to measure anything below one Plank length (and currently we can't measure anything below something like 10^20 Plank lengths) but that doesn't mean the Plank length is any kind of minimum distance.
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
I am attempting to use a Raman TruScan with a 785 nm laser to read a material for identification purposes. The material causes too much fluorescence and doesn’t not produce a good signal. However another lab is able to produce a good signal consistently using the same Raman model and sample material. What would be the reason for the different results between instruments?
Back
Top