What ideas does the discrepancy of CMB photons affect?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Hoku
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cmb Ideas Photons
Hoku
Messages
158
Reaction score
0
An article on news.discovery.com titled, "The Universe is Precisely 13.75 Billion Years Old" on Feb. 4 says:

"The amount of CMB radiation spotted near clusters of galaxies is greater than expected. According to [cosmological] theory, CMB photons should interact with these clusters, getting kicked to higher energies. WMAP cannot detect these higher energy photons, so there should be a deficit of CMB photons around clusters. This is not the case and scientists will probably be confused by this for some time to come."

What ideas of cosmological theory might this make us rethink?
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
For anyone wanting to read the full article it can be found http://news.discovery.com/space/the-universe-is-precisely-1375-billion-years-old.html".

In answer to your question, it is a bit confusing as this pop-sci article doesn't mention enough specifics to know what it is referring to exactly (i.e. what study has found a discrepancy?). What is being referred to is the Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect, and we have observed this in clusters (for instance read up on the South Pole Telescope). I'm not completely sure what the latest observational data of the SZ effect says, but I wasn't aware of any glaring discrepancies to date?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The WMAP results are not discrepant with other SZ observations. The problem is that the detected signal is 0.5-0.7 times that predicted from simulations, analytical calculations and X-ray observations. The result is more significant for low mass clusters and means we probably don't fully understand the cluster gas.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
8K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K