What Impact Will Cloning Have on Human Evolution?

  • Thread starter Thread starter franky_mojojo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cloning
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the potential impact of cloning on the evolutionary process and human health. It raises questions about whether therapeutic cloning could extend life expectancy and if cloning prominent figures could enhance societal quality of life. Participants agree that evolution has not stopped but acknowledge that medical advancements have changed its trajectory. There is a concern that individuals who might not survive certain diseases are now passing on their genes due to medical interventions. The idea of cloning individuals, particularly those with exceptional talents, is largely viewed as unwise, as it neglects the significant roles of environment and upbringing in shaping a person's abilities. Additionally, there is a strong advocacy for genetic testing and adoption as means to reduce the prevalence of genetic diseases in the population, emphasizing the importance of informed reproductive choices. The complexities of epigenetics and the risks associated with cloning are also highlighted as significant concerns.
franky_mojojo
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I was wondering what effect cloning will have (if any at all) on the evolutionary process. Would it increase life expectancy, using theraputic cloning? Assuming human cloning was given the all-clear, would we then go about cloning brilliant scientists, philosophers, etc to increase the quality of life? Would the evolutionary process stop (or has it already stopped), as those who shouldn't survive certain diseases, like cancer, begin to survive these diseases only for their genes to be passed on? Would like to hear your thoughts.
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Evolution has not yet "stopped," but medical intervention has certainly altered its course.

I personally hope that people who find out they are carriers for genetic diseases like cystic fibrosis will simply choose to adopt rather than parent genetic children. I also hope people who have a high likelihood of passing on other terrible diseases, like some familial cancers, will choose to adopt. I think that improved and more widespread genetic testing can lead, over time, to a voluntary removal of those genetic defects from the gene pool.

I don't feel that cloning entire people -- scientists or philosophers, for example -- is a wise idea. There is, of course, no way to tell whether a brilliant scientist was born with such destiny inherent in her genes, or whether her parenting and environment (which cannot be exactly duplicated) is equally important.

- Warren
 
chroot said:
I personally hope that people who find out they are carriers for genetic diseases like cystic fibrosis will simply choose to adopt rather than parent genetic children. I also hope people who have a high likelihood of passing on other terrible diseases, like some familial cancers, will choose to adopt. I think that improved and more widespread genetic testing can lead, over time, to a voluntary removal of those genetic defects from the gene pool.
I hope you are talking about the situation where both parents are carriers for the same disease? In such cases they now have the opportunity to do pre-implantation diagnostics.

I don't think cloning is a good idea, since you are playing with epigenetics (even in vitro fertilization is tricky, expect to see papers to come out on that in coming years). Cloning of individuals for their adult-life qualities is especially rediculous.
 
Deadly cattle screwworm parasite found in US patient. What to know. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2025/08/25/new-world-screwworm-human-case/85813010007/ Exclusive: U.S. confirms nation's first travel-associated human screwworm case connected to Central American outbreak https://www.reuters.com/business/environment/us-confirms-nations-first-travel-associated-human-screwworm-case-connected-2025-08-25/...
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
30
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
5K
Back
Top