Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

What is a good lens holder material

  1. Jul 17, 2007 #1
    I am just wondering what is a good material or a material i should look for when choosing to make for the lens holder.

    From my detector to the lens (focal length), does it need like a non-absorbing or non reflective material? When a manufacturer sells the complete camera set (regular camera) or IR camera, are these lens holder material made of plastic, metal, ..etc?

  2. jcsd
  3. Jul 17, 2007 #2


    User Avatar

    Hmm good is relevant only to your design parameters
    of cost, weight, durability, size, fabrication processes,
    mechanical precision required, stiffness required,
    impact / stress resistance, operational temperature,
    chemical environment, etc.

    An important criterion is whether adjustability of the
    lens positioning is required, or if it's a fixed mount.

    Even for fixed mounting there's often a question as to
    how or whether fine (tiny) positioning adjustments may be
    needed in any direction, and, if so, how much.

    You could certainly use a steel tube with a inner
    lip to back the lens, and a threaded barrel section to
    screw down a holder retention ring.

    Or you could use a spring loaded retention ring to hold
    the lens against some machined back plate.

    You could use machinable plastics like delrin to machine
    a holder from.

    You could use ceramic or glass if that suited your design
    and there was need for such low coefficients of thermal

    Certainly many mass produced consumer grade lens mounts in digital cameras are almost entirely made of
    injection molded plastic these days.

    It's common to use optically black / absorbing surface
    finishes on the lens tube / holder materials to damp
    undesired reflections / glare... black paint,
    dye mixed in plastic resin, carbon black,
    black anodization of aluminium, et. al. are all sometimes

    Generally metal allows for higher precision of machining,
    adjustment, and higher stiffness and impact durability than
    many kinds of plastic would offer unless the plastic
    were of very high quality and much thicker than the metal.

    Steel is generally best among metals for its strength and
    environmental ruggedness, though for a light weight
    application that can sacrifice some of the rigidity/strength,
    aluminium may be quite suitable.

    A factor to consider is your lens cell design and the
    shape of the lens elements which will be external;
    certainly it's easier to mount plane surfaces against
    flat machined walls / lips than it might be to mount
    highly curved convex surfaces. And if you're mounting
    highly curved concave surfaces, you'll have to ensure that
    the mounting periphery of the lens elements are going to
    provide a good safe contact with the cell holder without
    too much pressure on thin lens edge areas. Actually
    that could be true of thin convex lenses or thin elements
    of any kind.

    If you want to machine something yourself or in a
    "one of a kind" type small shop operation, you'll probably
    find that something like aluminium or delrin would be
    relatively cost effective to work with since they're soft
    and easily machined.

    If you want something very rugged look at steel, and
    be prepared to pay a pretty penny for machining or
    externally fabricated precision parts.

    For something just easily hacked together as an
    experiment even acrylic or cast epoxy/fiberglass
    sheet/tube/block may not be bad.
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook