What is a mass independent renormalization scheme

RedX
Messages
963
Reaction score
3
What is it meant by "mass-independent renormalization scheme"?

Does it mean that the counter-terms that cancel the infinities do not have dimensions of mass? In this case, any regularization scheme not involving the cutoff method, such as dimensional regularization?

Or does it mean that none of the counter-terms contain the mass 'm' of the particle?
So that even in dimensional regularization scheme, when canceling the pole, you could also decide to also cancel a term like log(m/\mu), which would make this mass-dependent?

Is MS (or MS-bar) a mass-independent renormalization scheme?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
RedX said:
Or does it mean that none of the counter-terms contain the mass 'm' of the particle?
So that even in dimensional regularization scheme, when canceling the pole, you could also decide to also cancel a term like log(m/\mu), which would make this mass-dependent?
Yes.
RedX said:
Is MS (or MS-bar) a mass-independent renormalization scheme?
Yes.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top