What is a Russian style in mathematics?

Demystifier
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
14,567
Reaction score
7,160
Many times I have seen the claim that some text on mathematics is written in a "good Russian style". What does that mean?

Somehow I've got an impression that it is a kind of opposite to the Bourbaki style. Namely, a Russian style would not consist of a dry series of abstract general theorems and proofs. Instead, it would contain a lot of practical examples that teach you how to apply math to practical problems. Is that correct? Or perhaps it means something else?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Yes, I think to a considerable degree you are right. In my experience, the level of rigor may vary. I have read work by Russian mathematicians that is very applied and mathematically precise at the same time, see e.g. Mark Krasnosel'skii.

Perhaps you find some of the links on V.I. Arnold's wiki interesting. He had quite a strong opinion about mathematics' tendency towards increased abstraction. (Look for the phrase "Bourbaki" on that page.) You may find this biography useful as well. Of course, Russian style is not identically equal to Arnold's style, but he may provide a prominent example.

Incidentally, I find it difficult to really appreciate Arnold, for he has worked in so many fields (ranging from pure to applied) and I'm familiar with only a few of those. His books on differential equations and mechanics are not among my personal favorites.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes heff001 and Demystifier
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top