What is a suitable thickness for a spinal disc implant endplate?

AI Thread Summary
Determining the suitable thickness for a spinal disc implant endplate involves considering the mechanical properties and load-bearing requirements of the design. The discussion highlights the complexity of using Winkler foundations, which may not be applicable for this scenario. Participants suggest exploring alternative methods or resources for calculating the thickness, as the original poster's link is inaccessible. It is emphasized that understanding the specific requirements of the implant is crucial for making an informed decision. Further research into relevant forums and literature on spinal implant design is recommended.
cabellos6
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
rectangular plate bending...

I am designing an endplate for a spinal disc implant as shown in the image below.

http://img155.imageshack.us/my.php?i...ndplatenb5.jpg"

I need to determine a suitable thickness of plate h. I thought about looking into winkler foundations to begin with but i have not studied this as yet and my supervisor has since told me this is too complex. Looking at the picture above how might i go about finding this suitable thickness of plate h?

Thanks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org


I am unable to open the link.
 


There also may be some forums that could be of some use, search "winkler foundations".
 


Winkler foundations are usually meant for beams on flexible foundations. Are you sure that is what you really need (I can't open the link either)?
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top