What is an inertial frame of reference?

AI Thread Summary
An inertial frame of reference is defined as a frame where Newton's first law of motion holds true, meaning that a particle at rest or moving at constant velocity experiences no net force. Inertial frames are characterized by the absence of acceleration; thus, if a frame is accelerating, it cannot be considered inertial. The discussion highlights that inertia is the property that allows objects to maintain their state of motion unless acted upon by an external force. A practical example illustrates that even if an object appears stationary in one frame, it may appear to change velocity in an accelerating frame. Overall, understanding inertial frames is crucial for applying Newtonian physics accurately.
alpha372
Messages
43
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


What is an inertial frame of reference?


Homework Equations


-A particle at rest or moving at a constant velocity in an inertial frame of reference implies that the sum of the forces acting on the particle is zero
-The tendency of a body to keep moving once it is set in motion results from a property called inertia.


The Attempt at a Solution


My best guess is that it is a location in space where internal or external forces are not acting on it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why guess? That's just asking for a definition. You can probably look it up in the index of your textbook.
 
My text just says, "A frame of reference in which Newton's first law is valid is called an inertial frame of reference." But, it doesn't give specific if then conditionals on the the phrase "in which Newton's first law is valid." For instance, it doesn't say, Newton's first law is valid if... or, "Newton's first law is not valid if..."

Although, with a bit more reading, the text seems to hint that a frame which is accelerating is not an inertial frame of reference. I would like some verification for this, because the book doesn't just come right out and say it; I tend to have a preference for outright definitions.
 
A simple phrasing of Newton's first law is "Objects will not change velocity unless acted upon by a force". Velocity is relative to your frame of reference.

Suppose you have a brick just floating there in space, light years from the nearest gravity well, for all intents and purposes unaffected by outside forces. Further suppose you arbitrarily accelerate your frame of reference to 200 miles per hour in some random direction. The brick has now changed velocity in your frame, despite not having been acted upon by a force.

So, no, accelerating frames are not inertial. As for definitions, Newton defined inertial frames as frames not accelerating relative to "the fixed stars", but that formulation is a bit out of date.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top