What is an inner product and how can it be verified for polynomials?

bernoli123
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
[-1]int[1]P(x)Q(x)dx P,Q\inS
verify that this is an inner product.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What are the properties that define an inner product? You must show that your form satisfies all those properties.
 
Also, you need to give more information.
1) What is S?
2) This defines an inner product on which set?
 
what are the properties that can define the inner product? I know this only that
inner product is a generalization of the dot product. tell me more about this
 
If you really don't know what an inner product is, why are you asking this question?

An inner product, defined on a vector space, V, is a function that associates every pair of vectors, (u, v), a real number <u, v> satisfying
1) Linearity: <au+ bv, w>= a<u, w>+ b<v, w>
(If the vector space is over the complex numbers, a and b on the right should be their complex conjugates.)
2) <u, u>= 0 if and only if u= 0.
3) <u, u> is greater than 0 if u is not 0.

Here, you are defining <P, Q> to be int, from -1 to 1, P(x)Q(x)dx where P and Q are polynomials.

If int from -1 to 1 of P(x)^2 dx= 0, what can you say about P? What if P(x)= x^3?
 
HallsofIvy said:
If you really don't know what an inner product is, why are you asking this question?

An inner product, defined on a vector space, V, is a function that associates every pair of vectors, (u, v), a real number <u, v> satisfying
1) Linearity: <au+ bv, w>= a<u, w>+ b<v, w>
(If the vector space is over the complex numbers, a and b on the right should be their complex conjugates.)
2) <u, u>= 0 if and only if u= 0.
3) <u, u> is greater than 0 if u is not 0.

Here, you are defining <P, Q> to be int, from -1 to 1, P(x)Q(x)dx where P and Q are polynomials.

If int from -1 to 1 of P(x)^2 dx= 0, what can you say about P? What if P(x)= x^3?

This question was from a new poster.
The wikipedia article on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inner_product_space" is fairly good. To get familiar with them, try taking some of the examples they give there, and proving that they are indeed inner product spaces. You should also try to prove that every finite-dimensional inner product space over the field \mathbb{F} is isomorphic to \mathbb{F}^n.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...

Similar threads

Back
Top