What is and is not Mainstream Astrophysics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Saul
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Astrophysics
AI Thread Summary
Astrophysics relies on observational data to distinguish between competing theories, leading to scientific evolution based on logical reasoning rather than opinion. Published papers present alternative theories that contribute to this discourse. The community does not need to wait for textbooks to be updated to engage in discussions about these theories. However, the forum emphasizes adherence to its rules regarding speculative posts, suggesting that deeper discussions should occur in peer-reviewed journals instead. The need for clarity in what constitutes mainstream astrophysics remains a topic of contention.
Saul
Messages
271
Reaction score
4
Astrophysics is an observational science.

When there is observational data in published papers that distinguishes between one theory and another, typically science changes. There are published papers that describe the competing theory.

Science is not an opinion poll. There must be logical reasons why we believe what we believe. That is the definition of science.

We do not need to wait until textbooks are re-published.

What is required in addition to observational data?

This subject needs to be discussed.
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
This seems to be a thinly veiled complaint about what is and is not permitted here. I would encourage you to re-read the PF Rules you agreed to when you signed up, particularly the section on overly speculative posts.

The subject may need to be discussed, but it doesn't have to be discussed here. Peer-reviewed journals are the place for that discussion.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top