What Is Earth's Equilibrium Temperature Assuming Blackbody Radiation?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating Earth's equilibrium temperature based on the solar constant of 1.36x10^3 W/m^2, assuming Earth behaves as a blackbody. The key equation referenced is the Stefan-Boltzmann law, which relates temperature to energy radiated. A participant realizes the mistake of using the full surface area of Earth instead of the circular cross-section that absorbs solar energy. Correctly calculating the absorbed energy is crucial for determining the equilibrium temperature. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding energy absorption in blackbody radiation calculations.
FreeAnnyong
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The energy reaching Earth from the Sun at the top of the atmosphere is 1.36x10^3 W/m^2, called the solar constant. Assuming that Earth radiates like a blackbody at uniform temperature, what do you conclude is the equilibrium temperature of Earth?


Homework Equations



Stefan-Boltzmann law: R=\sigmaT^4, Wein's displacement law: (\lambdamax)T=2.898x10^-3 mK

The Attempt at a Solution



I know that the Earth radiates the same amount of energy it takes in if it is acting as a black body, but I am stuck at figuring out how much energy the Earth is actually absorbing from the sun. If I can figure that out I know what to do with the rest of the problem.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you look up the radius of the Earth and assume it absorbs all of the energy that crosses the circular cross section it presents to the sun, wouldn't that do it?
 
Ah, you're right, I was stupidly using the full surface area of the Earth instead of a cross section.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top