What Is Geodesic Incompleteness in General Relativity?

  • Thread starter Thread starter latentcorpse
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gr Singularities
latentcorpse
Messages
1,411
Reaction score
0
Singularities in GR are often associated with geodesic incompleteness.

My question is what does it actually mean for a geodesic to be incomplete?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
From my vague understanding, geodesic incompleteness is when we can't extrapolate the function over all of space & time.
 
yes but what about the t=0 big bang singularity. is this a singularity because we can only extrapolate geodesics as far back as to a time just after t=0 but we can't extend them to the t=0 region of spacetime itself and so the geodesics are incomplete?
 
latentcorpse said:
yes but what about the t=0 big bang singularity. is this a singularity because we can only extrapolate geodesics as far back as to a time just after t=0 but we can't extend them to the t=0 region of spacetime itself and so the geodesics are incomplete?

From what I understand of GR, yes.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top