What is going on with Earth's longwave energy imbalance?

  • Thread starter Thread starter johnbbahm
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Earth Energy
AI Thread Summary
Earth's energy imbalance has increased from 0.5 ± 0.2 Wm−2 to 1.0 ± 0.2 Wm−2 since 2000, primarily due to a rise in absorbed solar radiation (ASR). This increase is partially countered by a rise in outgoing longwave radiation (OLR), which is expected to decrease due to added greenhouse gases. However, the relationship between ASR and OLR suggests that even if OLR increases, the net energy imbalance can still lead to warming. The discussion highlights that positive feedback mechanisms in the climate system amplify the initial radiative imbalance, complicating the relationship between greenhouse gas forcing and OLR. Ultimately, the data does not clearly indicate any positive forcing in the longwave spectrum, raising questions about the initial perturbations needed for feedback.
johnbbahm
Messages
306
Reaction score
33
TL;DR Summary
Recorded increase in Outbound Longwave Radiation (OLR) since year 2000.
Observational Assessment of Changes in Earth’s Energy Imbalance Since 2000: 2024
Satellite observations from the Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System show that Earth’s energy imbalance has doubled from 0.5 ± 0.2 Wm−2 during the first 10 years of this century to 1.0 ± 0.2 Wm−2 during the past decade. The increase is the result of a 0.9 ± 0.3 Wm−2 increase absorbed solar radiation (ASR) that is partially offset by a 0.4 ± 0.25 Wm−2 increase in outgoing longwave radiation (OLR).
Added greenhouse gases are supposed to be decreasing the OLR.
 
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
If the ASR from effective albedo, etc., decreases more than the OLR increases (a natural negative feedback due to the Stefan-Boltzmann relationship) then you still have a net positive energy imbalance, hence net warming.
 
I thought of that also, but for it to be feedback, it has to be feedback from some earlier warming input.
The earlier warming input would have to be forced by an energy imbalance, but if the OLR is increasing,
it cannot be added greenhouse gases that caused the forcing, as their forcing would show up as reduced OLR.
 
Say a “unit” of greenhouse gas forcing temporarily decreases OLR and causes temperatures to rise. Eventually OLR has to catch up and counteract the earlier imbalance; else the system would keep warming indefinitely.

In the real climate system, there are additional positive feedbacks that amplify the “original” radiative imbalance, and hence the OLR has to make up for them as well. That’s why the OLR at later times is not just the same as original but actually larger even though the original forcing initially caused a decrease in OLR.
 
olivermsun said:
Say a “unit” of greenhouse gas forcing temporarily decreases OLR and causes temperatures to rise. Eventually OLR has to catch up and counteract the earlier imbalance; else the system would keep warming indefinitely.

In the real climate system, there are additional positive feedbacks that amplify the “original” radiative imbalance, and hence the OLR has to make up for them as well. That’s why the OLR at later times is not just the same as original but actually larger even though the original forcing initially caused a decrease in OLR.
From the data it is difficult to see if any positive forcing happened at all, in the longwave spectrum. Without the initial perturbation, there would not be anything to feedback upon.
 
We have little shade but plenty of wind on my property. The upshot of this is that I have to be judicious in how/where I put up shade-creating barriers in various places around my property to maximise shade without unduly large windage. My property is an irregular polygon and not aligned with the cardinal axes, so it is not easy to tell where the shade will be at a given time. For example, I have put up an umbrella next to our pool, but it can only shade the southish-side of the pool, and...
Thread 'The Secrets of Prof. Verschure's Rosetta Stones'
(Edit: since the thread title was changed, this first sentence is too cryptic: the original title referred to a Tool song....) Besides being a favorite song by a favorite band, the thread title is a straightforward play on words. This summer, as a present to myself for being promoted, I purchased a collection of thin sections that I believe comprise the research materials of Prof. Rob Verschure, who at the time was faculty in the Geological Institute in Amsterdam. What changed this...
These last days, there is a seemingly endless cluster of rather powerful earthquakes close to the islands of Santorini, Amorgos, Anafi, and Ios. Remember, this is a highly volcanically active region, Santorini especially being famous for the supervolcanic eruption which is conjectured to have led to the decline of the Minoan civilization: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minoan_eruption To grasp the scale of what is happening, between the 26th of January and the 9th of February, 12000...
Back
Top