Chronos said:
The problem centers around determinism - a logic based essentially on the classical concept of 'what goes up must come down' - which is refuted by quantum mechanics.
If it were that easy to fix the problem I doubt that Stephen Hawking, Leonard Susskind, and Gerard 't Hooft would be arguing over this.
The problem is that the equations of quantum mechanics are deterministic. Given a wave function, the time evolution of that wave function is fixed, and you can define information in quantum terms such that the total amount of information is conserved.
Also, be careful about analogies. The example I'm using of crushing a flash drive is the best thing I can think of to illustrate the problem to someone without writing integral signs. As with all physics analogies, they simplify a lot of stuff.
Information is like currency - neither created or destroyed, merely exchanged.
The statement about currency is false (and dangerously false), but that's another thread.
Assuming black holes 'leak' [hawking radiation], I see no paradox.
That's the problem. If information were not destroyed, then what goes into the black hole should affect the Hawking radiation that comes out, but that idea contradicts the idea that black holes have no hair. The other problem is the singularity. If I toss a flash drive into a black hole, and it somehow floats in the black hole, you can imagine that it will somehow affect the radiation coming out, but that's not what happens (or is it?).
What happens if you use GR is that the flash drive gets crushed to a singularity long before there is any Hawking radiation. Now maybe somehow the singularity influences the Hawking radiation, but if that happens we are outside of standard GR and QM (not to say that that's a bad thing.)
The point of this paradox is that something is broken in theory. Now the way you figure out what happens is to take a black hole, toss something in, and see what happens, and oddly enough, we should very soon be able to do that...
http://arxiv.org/abs/1105.5645