1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

What is it that makes this problem different?

  1. Oct 14, 2011 #1
    Normally when finding the normal force on an object on a incline, I find the magnitudes of gravity in the perpendicular and parallel directions to the incline and have that multiplied by mass. Here is a diagram of that:
    http://www.freeimagehosting.net/38f87

    Which means that the magnitude of n is m*g*cos theta.

    On another kind of problem were I am asked to find the speed that a mass can move around a circle of an inclined plane, the normal force is different:
    http://www.freeimagehosting.net/edfa7

    In this case n = m*g / cos theta.

    Why is this?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Oct 14, 2011 #2

    Doc Al

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    What allows you to deduce this is the fact that the acceleration normal to the surface is zero.
    Here the acceleration normal to the surface is not zero. But since the acceleration is horizontal, you can say that the vertical component of the acceleration is zero.
     
  4. Oct 15, 2011 #3
    Oh, I think I understand what you are saying. So the normal force is greater than m*g*cos theta because the centripetal force also has some force in the normal direction? In other words, it is the sum of these two?

    N = m*[(v^2/r)*sin theta + g*cos theta]
     
  5. Oct 15, 2011 #4

    Doc Al

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    It's better to think that the acceleration has a component in the normal direction and just apply Newton's 2nd law in that direction:
    ƩF = ma
    N - mg*cosθ = m(v^2/r)*sinθ

    Which is entirely equivalent to what you wrote. It's best not to think of 'centripetal force' as a separate force. Here, the 'centripetal force' is provided by a component of the normal force.

    Even simpler is to look at the vertical direction:
    ƩF = ma = 0
    N*cosθ - mg = 0
    Thus: N = mg/cosθ
     
  6. Oct 15, 2011 #5
    I see what you mean. The last that you mentioned is how I originally saw it. I guess its simplicity is what cough me off guard. I always over complicate things. For some reason it just seems easier, if that makes any sense.

    Thanks.
     
  7. Oct 15, 2011 #6

    Redbelly98

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    Weird, one of the students I tutor asked me this same question the other day. We were looking at a centripetal acceleration problem, and he proceeded to write N=mg·cosθ because he was used to always seeing it that way.
     
  8. Oct 15, 2011 #7
    Yep. It's these books (or at least mine). It lacks a lot of intuition and goes straight to the math. I have now gotten to the point that I blearily look at the math examples. I just read the material for the concepts and figure out the math that is intuitive to me.

    I imagine it is better this way as you are less likely to become fixated to formulas. That is something I dispise, just grabbing formulas, at which seemed to get the best of me in this example. It suppresses critical thinking/abilities.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: What is it that makes this problem different?
  1. What's the difference? (Replies: 2)

Loading...