What is q (the charge) in higgs mechanism?

ariel97
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
what is "q" (the charge) in higgs mechanism?

hi,

does anybody know what kind of charge the "q" stand for in the higgs mechanism?

I mean the mechanism between the weak force mediators: W & Z, and the higgs boson, which leads to them acquiring mass.

I've learned about it from the textbook by David Griffiths "Introduction to Elementary Particles". There in section 10.9 (2nd addition) or 11.9 (1st addition) he introduces the "q" along with the covariant derivative (first stage by Weyl to transform the Lagrangian into an invariant under local phase transformasions), which leads me to consider it being the charge of the weak force, as was the case with implemnting Weyl's procedure for QED & for QCD. However, in those cases the Interaction was electromagneic or strong respectively, while in the Higgs Mechanism the interaction is of the kind needed to grant mass to the weak force mediators, and NOT a weak force interaction at all.

That's why I have a huge problem figuring out what "q" really stands for.

thanks in advance to anyone who might help, and thanks for spendind the time reading my question.

Shalom,
A.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


ariel97, I don't know what Griffiths calls q, but the masses of W and Z are MW = ½vg, MZ = ½v√(g2 + g'2) where v is the vacuum value of the Higgs field, v = 246 GeV, and g, g' are the coupling constants that appear in the covariant derivative: ∂μ + ig(½τ·Wμ) - ig'(½Bμ)
 
Last edited:


Hi ariel97,

What's happening here is that he's presenting the "Higgs mechanism" not as it appears in the Standard model, but in a simplified model- a complex scalar field with a U(1) gauge symmetry (i.e. the freedom to make local phase redefinitions of the field). This is the same gauge symmetry as quantum electrodynamics, so the model- without symmetry breaking- is sometimes called "scalar QED". q here would correspond to the electric charge of the field in this model, and the gauge boson that gains a mass would be a "photon".

In the electroweak sector of the standard model, the real-world Higgs breaks a more complicated gauge symmetry- SU(2)xU(1), where the U(1) isn't the electromagnetism gauge group, but its charge is instead called "hypercharge". The real Higgs has a hypercharge, and is complex doublet of the SU(2) symmetry, but has no electric charge, which is why the real photon is still massless; the U(1) of electromagnetism is a subgroup of the SU(2)xU(1) that remains unbroken.

I don't know of a better introductory explanation of all of this than in these lecture notes:
http://hep.ph.liv.ac.uk/~tara/lectures/sm_signer.ps

Hope that helps.
 


thank you both so much for replying

muppet: my computer doesn't recognize the file type, and doesn't know which program to use to open it. I don't recognize the ending ".ps" either. If u can tell me how to open it I'd appreciate it.

I know the author simplifies the theory, but yet I think we can expect the simplified model to be consistent with the actuall generalization of the theory in the standard model. It can't contradict in any way the broader theory, can it? so I'm trying to figure out what in accordance with the parallelism, what role is played by "q", following his on stages.

Bill_K: thank you, that's my reason for suspecting it might be the weak force charge, as it also appears in the mass term for the mediators of the weak force, in this theory, and the coupling constants are related to the charge relavant to the interaction it is used to describe. so thanks again.
 


The .ps is a PostScript file. I found I could open it using PDFCreator - http://sourceforge.net/projects/pdfcreator/ , which is a free download for PCs and very useful anyway as it let's you make PDFs of anything you could print to a printer.

To do this, open up PDFCreator from the Start Menu (via Programs) and then open the file using the Document -> Add menu. You can then save it as a PDF.
 
Last edited:
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top