What is scattering by a potential and how does it affect a passing particle?

Shaybay92
Messages
122
Reaction score
0
"Scattering" by a potential

When we have an unbound particle traveling past a potential well, what does it mean when it is said that the potential well will "scatter" the particle?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


In the one-dimensional case, it means that there is some probability that the particle will be reflected instead of transmitted.

In the two- or three-dimensional case, it means that there is some probability that the particle will emerge in a different direction than it entered.
 


What do you mean when you say transmitted/reflected? If we are talking about a beam of electrons moving towards an attractive square potential (-ve well), what is meant by whether it is transmitted or not..? (In 1D)
 


Suppose the particle is coming in from the -x direction, that is, it is traveling in the +x direction. Then:

Transmitted = after interacting with the barrier, it is traveling in the +x direction.

Reflected = after interacting with the barrier, it is traveling in the -x direction.
 


Ok, but how physically does this make sense? How does the fact it goes past a potential change its path? I suppose I still don't fully understand what potential wells represent physically.
 


In classical mechanics a proton, say, produces an electric field, and a passing electron can be deflected ("scattered") by this electric field. You can also write the problem in terms of the electron moving in an electric potential set up by the proton. This is how you have to do the problem in quantum mechanics.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In her YouTube video Bell’s Theorem Experiments on Entangled Photons, Dr. Fugate shows how polarization-entangled photons violate Bell’s inequality. In this Insight, I will use quantum information theory to explain why such entangled photon-polarization qubits violate the version of Bell’s inequality due to John Clauser, Michael Horne, Abner Shimony, and Richard Holt known as the...
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
I asked a question related to a table levitating but I am going to try to be specific about my question after one of the forum mentors stated I should make my question more specific (although I'm still not sure why one couldn't have asked if a table levitating is possible according to physics). Specifically, I am interested in knowing how much justification we have for an extreme low probability thermal fluctuation that results in a "miraculous" event compared to, say, a dice roll. Does a...
Back
Top