What Is the Absorbance of a Diluted Copper Solution?

  • Thread starter Thread starter hongkong
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Absorbance
AI Thread Summary
The absorbance of a diluted copper solution can be calculated using the original absorbance and concentration. Solution A has an absorbance of 0.390 at a concentration of 0.0283 M. When 6.57 mL of this solution is diluted to 100.0 mL, the new concentration is approximately 0.0018 M. The absorbance of the diluted solution should be calculated using the Beer-Lambert Law, which indicates that absorbance should not exceed 1 for practical measurements. The calculation presented, resulting in an absorbance of 5.93607, is unrealistic and suggests a need to re-evaluate the dilution and absorbance relationship.
hongkong
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Solution A, while in a 1.0 cm cell, has an absorbance of 0.390 and a [Cu2+] = 0.0283 M. Then, 6.57 mL of solution A is diluted with pure water to 100.0 mL. What is the absorbance of this diluted solution?

The below is what I did. But I am not sure about the answer. Can you please check it? If there is something wrong, please correct! Thanks a lot!

concentration of dilute solution----6.57ml of 0.0283M = 100.0ml x M
Solve for M----( 100 x 0.0283 ) / 6.57 = 0.4307

Solve for absorbance: 0.390/A = 0.0283/0.4307

==> Absorbance (A) = 5.93607
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you really believe that when you dilute something with an original absorbance of about 0.4 you get a solution with an absorbance of about 6?

Remember A = abc where a is molar absorptivity, b is path length and c is concentration. You can solve for 'a' using nothing more than what is originally given to you for Solution A. Use it to solve for the new 'c' in the diluted sample. 'a' will be the same for this compound regardless of its concentration.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top