What is the Accuracy of Airflow Measurements Using Multiple Devices?

  • Thread starter Thread starter russ_watters
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Accuracy
Messages
23,694
Reaction score
11,132
I ran into an issue on a project where I'm needing to be sure of the accuracy of airflow measurements being taken. There are two basic ways to measure the airflow of an air conditioning system:

1. First is to traverse the main supply duct with a pito-static tube array and a differential pressure gage and measure the whole system airflow at once. These measurements have an accuracy of 2% with a 95% confidence factor. This is a typical rated accuracy for such sensors/gauges.

2. Second is to measure the airflow at each airflow control device, which has a very similar piece of equipment (a pito-static array with a pressure transducer) permanently installed - and add-up the numbers. The accuracy of each device is then about the same as in #1. For this example, I have somewhere around 100 of these devices. What is the accuracy of this airflow measurement?

It seems to me that method #2 should yield an accuracy far better than of 2%, but I'm not sure and I don't know how to calculate the accuracy. Can anyone help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If your measurement errors at each pressure transducer is independent of the error at the other transducers, then the total relative variance will be 100 times smaller and the accuracy (confidence interval) thus sqrt(100) = 10 times smaller (= 0.2% accuracy with 95% confidence)
 
winterfors said:
If your measurement errors at each pressure transducer is independent of the error at the other transducers,
It is.
...then the total relative variance will be 100 times smaller and the accuracy (confidence interval) thus sqrt(100) = 10 times smaller (= 0.2% accuracy with 95% confidence)
Ok, simple enough: so the accuracy is just the square root of the number of measurements times the accuracy of each individual measurement (assuming they are all of the same accuracy).

Thanks very much.
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top