MHB What is the acute angle at $P$ where lines $(AG)$ and $(HB)$ intersect?

  • Thread starter Thread starter karush
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Box Vectors
karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
The following diagram show a solid figure ABCDEFGH. Each of the six faces is a parallelogram
26.png


The coordinates of A and B are A(7,−3,−5),B(17,2,5)

$\vec{AB} = \langle 17-7, 2+3, 5+5 \rangle = \langle 10, 5, 10 \rangle$

$|AB|= \begin{align*} \sqrt{ (17 - 7)^2 + [2 - (-3)]^2 + [5 -(-5)]^2} \end{align*}=15$

The following information is given

$\vec{AD}=\left[ \begin{array}{c} -6 \\ 6 \\3 \end{array} \right]$ , $|AD|=9$ , $\vec{AE}=\left[ \begin{array}{c} -2 \\ -4 \\4 \end{array} \right]$ , $|AE|=6$

I assume the following is Dot product
$A\cdot B = a_{1}b_{1}+a_{2}b_{2}+a_{3}b_{3}$

Calculate $A\cdot B$

$-6\cdot -2+6\cdot -4+3\cdot 4=0$

thus $A\perp B$

more ? to come just seeing if this is correct:D
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It looks as though you have calculated (with a typo, but the correct result):

$$\overrightarrow{AD}\cdot\overrightarrow{AE}=0$$

Is this correct?
 
(ii) Calculate $\vec{AB}\cdot\vec{AD}$

$\left[ \begin{array}{c} 10 \\ 5 \\ 10 \end{array} \right]\cdot
\left[ \begin{array}{c} -6 \\ 6 \\ 3 \end{array} \right]$

$10(-6)+5(6)+10(3)=0$
(iii) Calculate $\vec{AB}\cdot\vec{AE}$
$\left[ \begin{array}{c} 10 \\ 5 \\ 10 \end{array} \right]\cdot
\left[ \begin{array}{c} -2 \\ -4 \\ 4 \end{array} \right]$

$10(-2)+5(-4)+10(4)=0$

$\vec{AB}\perp \vec{AD}$ and $\vec{AB}\perp \vec{AE}$ since dot products $= 0$

(c) Calculate the volume of the solid $ABCDEFGH$

since $|\vec{AB}|=15$, $|\vec{AD}|=9$, $|\vec{AE}|=6$ then $V=(15)(9)(6)=810$ units$^2$
 
https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/1039
(d) The coordinates of $G$ are $(9, 4, 12)$ Find the coordinates of $H$

Since $\vec{AB} = \left[ \begin{array}{c} 10 \\ 5 \\ 10 \end{array} \right]$

then can we take G and subtract $\vec{AB}$ from it get $H$

$\left[ \begin{array}{c} 9 \\ 4 \\ 12 \end{array} \right]-\left[ \begin{array}{c} 10 \\ 5 \\ 10 \end{array} \right]=\left[ \begin{array}{c} -1 \\ -1 \\ 2 \end{array} \right]$

there is one more question to this but want to see if so far is correct...
 
karush said:
https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/1039
(d) The coordinates of $G$ are $(9, 4, 12)$ Find the coordinates of $H$

Since $\vec{AB} = \left[ \begin{array}{c} 10 \\ 5 \\ 10 \end{array} \right]$

then can we take G and subtract $\vec{AB}$ from it get $H$

$\left[ \begin{array}{c} 9 \\ 4 \\ 12 \end{array} \right]-\left[ \begin{array}{c} 10 \\ 5 \\ 10 \end{array} \right]=\left[ \begin{array}{c} -1 \\ -1 \\ 2 \end{array} \right]$

there is one more question to this but want to see if so far is correct...

I agree with this answer :)
 
(d) The lines $(AG)$ and $(HB)$ intersect at $P$
and given that
$\vec{AG}=\left[ \begin{array}{c} 2 \\ 7 \\ 17 \end{array} \right]$
find the acute angle at $P$




$\vec{HB}=(-1,-1,2) + (17,2,5) = (16,1,7)$ and $|AG|=3\sqrt{38}$

then

$COS^{-1}\left(\frac{\vec{AG}\cdot\vec{HB}}{(3\sqrt{38})^2}\right) \approx 62.38^o$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top