What is the amplitude of vibration for a fish on a spring scale?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tjohn101
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Amplitude
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the amplitude of vibration for a fish on a spring scale, which stretches 4.1 cm under a 2.7 kg load. The spring stiffness constant is determined to be 645.37 N/m. When the fish is pulled down an additional 2.0 cm and released, the amplitude of vibration is actually 2.0 cm, not the incorrect assumption of 6.1 cm. The frequency of vibration is calculated to be approximately 2.46 Hz. The key takeaway is that amplitude is defined as the maximum displacement from the equilibrium position, which is 2.0 cm in this scenario.
tjohn101
Messages
92
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A fisherman's scale stretches 4.1 cm when a 2.7 kg fish hangs from it.

(a) What is the spring stiffness constant?
645.3658537 N/m
(b) What will be the amplitude and frequency of vibration if the fish is pulled down 2.0 cm more and released so that it vibrates up and down?
amplitude ? cm
frequency 2.460601261 Hz


Homework Equations


I thought it was as simple as 2.0+4.1=6.1 cm. I was wrong.


The Attempt at a Solution


Shown above.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The amplitude is the maximum displacement from the equilibrium position. How far from the equilibrium position is the fish when it is pulled down 2.0 cm?
 
It is already 4.1 cm away, right? Wouldn't adding 2 cm just make it 6.1 cm away?
 
You can use the period of oscillation:
T=2\pi\sqrt{\frac{m}{k}}
then put what you found for the period in this equation:
f=\frac{1}{T}
 
Uhh.. for amplitude?
 
With the fish on the spring the spring stretches by 4.1 cm and the fish is at rest. When the fish is at rest, it is at the equilibrium position. When the fish is pulled down by 2.0 cm it is 2.0 cm below the equilibrium position. If the fish is let go, what is the amplitude?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top