What is the Angular Acceleration of a Rod?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the angular acceleration of a rod using torque and moment of inertia. The correct formula for angular acceleration is given as angular accel = Torque/Itot, where Torque is derived from gravitational force acting at the center of mass. The initial attempt yielded an incorrect angular acceleration due to miscalculating the distance 'L' in the torque equation. Participants emphasize that 'L' should represent the distance from the axis to the center of mass, not the end of the rod. Clarifications on mass considerations and adjustments to the torque equation lead to a more accurate calculation of angular acceleration.
euphtone06
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


http://img505.imageshack.us/img505/6741/rodprobbw3.gif"

Homework Equations


Itot= 1/3MrL^2 + 2/5 MsR^2 + Ms(L + R)^2 = 235.69784
Cm= (Mr(L/2) + Ms(L+r))/(Mr+Ms) = 4.915

angular accel = Torque/Itot
Torque= 1/2Lmgcos(theta)

The Attempt at a Solution


I solved for Itot and Center of mass and got the correct answers but, I am having a difficult time getting the angular acceleration correct.

Aa= .5Lmgcos(theta)/(Itot)
= .5*6*4*9.8cos31/235.697
= .42767 rad/s^2 which was incorrect
Please help don't know what went wrong!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The 'L' in your angular acceleration formula should be the distance from the axis to the point where the force causing the torque is exerted. In this case the gravitational force can be treated as being exerted at the center of mass, not at the end of the rod.
 
Do you have to account for the total mass of the system?
.5*4.915*(4+4?)*9.8*cos31/235.697= .7 rad/s^2
 
4+4? Don't you mean 4+1? Yes, total mass of system. And it looks like the 1/2 in your torque equation is coming from the assumption that the center of mass is the center of mass of the rod. Get rid of it and just put L to be distance from axis to center of mass.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top