What is the Angular Velocity of a Disk and Rod Combination?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the angular velocity of a combined system consisting of a uniform disk and a nonrotating rod. The disk initially spins at 9.5 revolutions per second, and when the rod is dropped onto it, both turn together around a spindle. Participants emphasize the importance of using conservation of angular momentum to find the final angular velocity. The moment of inertia for both the disk and rod must be calculated and summed to solve for the combined angular velocity. The key takeaway is to apply the conservation principle correctly to determine the system's new angular velocity after the rod is added.
Bones
Messages
108
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A uniform disk turns at 9.5 rev/s around a frictionless spindle. A nonrotating rod, of the same mass as the disk and length equal to the disk's diameter, is dropped onto the freely spinning disk, see the figure. They then turn together around the spindle with their centers superposed. What is the angular velocity of the combination?




Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I1w1= 1/2mr^2*9.5rev/sec
I2w2= 1/12ml^2*w2
That's as far as I got...is it even right??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bones said:
A uniform disk turns at 9.5 rev/s around a frictionless spindle. A nonrotating rod, of the same mass as the disk and length equal to the disk's diameter, is dropped onto the freely spinning disk, see the figure. They then turn together around the spindle with their centers superposed. What is the angular velocity of the combination?

I1w1= 1/2mr^2*9.5rev/sec
I2w2= 1/12ml^2*w2
That's as far as I got...is it even right??

Hi Bones! :smile:

(have an omega: ω :wink:)

Sort-of … the Is are right …

but you need conservation of angular momentum,

so for the "after" side, you'll need the total I, = I1 + I2, so that you can find (I1 + I22. :smile:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top