What is the asympote of this graph?

  • Thread starter Thread starter priscilla98
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Graph
AI Thread Summary
The graph of y = 2^x has a horizontal asymptote at y = 0, meaning as x approaches negative infinity, the value of y approaches zero but never actually reaches it. This is because the function is exponential and always positive, regardless of how negative x becomes. The confusion arises from the belief that the asymptote could be negative, but the correct interpretation is that y = 0 serves as the asymptote for both y = 2^x and y = 1/2^x. The graphs of these functions are reflections of each other across the y-axis, reinforcing the concept of their asymptotic behavior. Understanding this helps clarify the nature of exponential functions and their limits.
priscilla98
Messages
93
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



How come the graph of y = 2^x has a negative x-axis as an asympote. And what is the asympote of this graph?

Homework Equations



An asympote is a line that approaches the graph but does not intersect as x increases or decreases.

The Attempt at a Solution



I know the graph of y = 1/2^x has an asympote which is y = 0 because its closer to the y=0. But for y= 2^x, i only see the numbers increasing, would the asympote be y = - 2
 
Physics news on Phys.org


priscilla98 said:

Homework Statement



How come the graph of y = 2^x has a negative x-axis as an asympote. And what is the asympote of this graph?
Because as x gets more and more negative, y = 2^x gets closer to zero. The horizontal asymptote is the line y = 0.
priscilla98 said:

Homework Equations



An asympote is a line that approaches the graph but does not intersect as x increases or decreases.
I think you have this backwards. An asymptote is a line that the graph approaches. A curve can intersect or cross a horizontal asymptote for values of |x| that are relatively small, but won't intersect or cross when x is large or is very negative.
priscilla98 said:

The Attempt at a Solution



I know the graph of y = 1/2^x has an asympote which is y = 0 because its closer to the y=0. But for y= 2^x, i only see the numbers increasing, would the asympote be y = - 2
y = 2^x is defined for all real numbers x. You're focusing on large values of x. The curve is asymptotic to the x-axis for x approaching -infinity. The graphs of y = 2^x and y = 2^(-x) are reflections of each other across the y-axis, so if one has the positive x-axis as its horizontal asymptote (y = 2^(-x) = 1/2^x), the other will have the negative x-axis as its horizontal asymptote.
 


in the graph 2^x, doesn't matter what value for x, y NEVER can be zero or negative, because this is exponential relation. try x=-100000000, y is extremely small but can never be zero. The asymptote for that graph is y=0, where y can never approach value closer to zero.
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Essentially I just have this problem that I'm stuck on, on a sheet about complex numbers: Show that, for ##|r|<1,## $$1+r\cos(x)+r^2\cos(2x)+r^3\cos(3x)...=\frac{1-r\cos(x)}{1-2r\cos(x)+r^2}$$ My first thought was to express it as a geometric series, where the real part of the sum of the series would be the series you see above: $$1+re^{ix}+r^2e^{2ix}+r^3e^{3ix}...$$ The sum of this series is just: $$\frac{(re^{ix})^n-1}{re^{ix} - 1}$$ I'm having some trouble trying to figure out what to...
Back
Top