What is the Basis for a Row Reduced 3x3 Matrix in Linear Algebra?

  • Thread starter Thread starter fellupahill
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forum
fellupahill
Messages
56
Reaction score
0
Long story. Not a homework question, tho sometimes I think the person running the contest would think to use a forum contest to do his coursework. But it's not.

Topic: Linear algebra.

If no one gets it right after 3 days then we can use any means to get the question right, now becomes a race.

Row reduce a 3x3 matrix A to the identity matrix.What is a basis for the matrix?
hint:
(Diagnose a 3x3 matrix over complex numbers and 2 of the complex eigenvalues are row reducing to identity matrices when you do A-lambda*I (where lambda is the eigenvalue

Not copied directly, doing on my phone so sorry for the terrible grammar. And I can't, well more like I don't want to, tell you the prize of the contest, its super nerdy and embarrassing. Maybe not as bad as I think considering I am on a physics forum and there are probably a lot of WoW nerds, but now that I think about it, its worse than world or warcraft.

Edit: btw, I was going to put in homework section just cause it sounded like a homework question (and figuring people have more sympathy for a student and would respond quicker :p but it wouldn't let me start a topic. Search function would tell me but my phone is a pain so anyone care to tell a noob if its my phone messing up or is there a post count needed to use homework section?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
fellupahill said:
Long story. Not a homework question, tho sometimes I think the person running the contest would think to use a forum contest to do his coursework. But it's not.

Topic: Linear algebra.

If no one gets it right after 3 days then we can use any means to get the question right, now becomes a race.

Row reduce a 3x3 matrix A to the identity matrix.What is a basis for the matrix?
hint:
(Diagnose a 3x3 matrix over complex numbers and 2 of the complex eigenvalues are row reducing to identity matrices when you do A-lambda*I (where lambda is the eigenvalue

Not copied directly, doing on my phone so sorry for the terrible grammar. And I can't, well more like I don't want to, tell you the prize of the contest, its super nerdy and embarrassing. Maybe not as bad as I think considering I am on a physics forum and there are probably a lot of WoW nerds, but now that I think about it, its worse than world or warcraft.

Edit: btw, I was going to put in homework section just cause it sounded like a homework question (and figuring people have more sympathy for a student and would respond quicker :p but it wouldn't let me start a topic. Search function would tell me but my phone is a pain so anyone care to tell a noob if its my phone messing up or is there a post count needed to use homework section?

We generally do not allow contest-type questions on the PF, for the reason that you mention.

It does not take any post count to post in the Homework Help forums. However, contest-type questions are generally not allowed there either. Posters should fill out the Homework Help Template provided, including the Relevant Equations and Attempt at a Solution.
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
Back
Top