What is the behavior of ideal voltage/current sources in small signal analysis?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jinyong
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sources
AI Thread Summary
In small signal analysis, ideal voltage sources behave as short circuits because their output voltage remains constant regardless of the current, resulting in zero impedance (Z = 0). Conversely, ideal current sources act as open circuits since they maintain a constant output current despite variations in voltage, leading to infinite impedance (Z = ∞). The discussion emphasizes the mathematical relationship Z = dv/di to illustrate these behaviors. Additionally, the conversation touches on the ability of voltage sources to supply infinite current and current sources to provide infinite voltage. The thread concludes with a light-hearted note about LaTeX formatting for the infinity symbol.
jinyong
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Can someone please explain why ideal voltage/current sources are short circuit for voltage source and open circuit for open circuit in small signal analysis? Any mathematical proof to this?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I would think of it in terms of Z = \frac{dv}{di} (although there may be other ways).

For a good voltage source, the output voltage is very stiff (doesn't change much) as the output current changes, so

Z = \frac{dv}{di} = \frac{0}{di} = 0

But for a good current source, you get very little change in the output current over a wide range of output voltages, so

Z = \frac{dv}{di} = \frac{dv}{0} = infinity


EDIT -- okay, I give up. How do you make the little infinity symbol in LaTex? "\inf" didn't work.
 
Berkman is correct.

Voltage source can provide infinite amount of current. And a current source can provide an infinite amount of voltage.

Z = V/I

infty
\infty
 
Last edited:
waht said:
infty
\infty

Thanks waht! :biggrin:
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top