What is the best book for learning quantum theory?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on finding suitable books on quantum theory, with a particular emphasis on the need for texts that cater to visual learners. The original poster expresses dissatisfaction with Shankar's "Principles of Quantum Mechanics," citing its lack of visual aids and poor organization for their learning style. They prefer books that include diagrams, graphs, and a clear, top-down approach to presenting concepts. Recommendations include Bernd Thaller's "Visual Quantum Mechanics" series, which utilizes animations to illustrate quantum phenomena. The conversation highlights the challenge of navigating the extensive range of quantum mechanics literature and the importance of finding resources that align with individual learning preferences.
romistrub
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
I'm sure this question comes up a lot around here (I can see as much from the other threads on this page), but the flavour of this question is particular to me: I'm looking for books on quantum theory.

Now, I say "quantum theory" because I'm not entirely sure wherein lies the subsets of quantum physics, quantum mechanics, quantum information and the like, and I don't want to accidentally limit myself to any combination of these subsets where there exists a more general category.

I am currently in possession of these relevant titles:

Principals of Quantum Mechanics (Shankar)
Quantum Theory (Bohm)
Fundamentals of QM for Solid State Electronics and Optics (Tang)

To give you an idea of my learning style, here is my review of the Shankar book (just posted to Amazon.ca minutes ago):

I rate this title mid-mark, because this is what the rating system is intended for: to sample the opinions of many who have read the book. Hopefully my review will give the reader some context of this rating, since it is not poorly written nor low quality.

Let me stress that I am not so adoring of Shankar's exposition as most. It is indeed informal, as the other reviews suggest, but it is also flat and very incompatible with *my learning style* (not to be confused with *your* learning style).

Let me explain what I mean by "flat". I am a very visual learner, and in texts that accommodate this, I am content flying back and forth through chapters, recalling material and justifying expansions on past results. Shankar's book feels much more like a transcript than a textbook. Examples are strewn throughout chapters, and hardly differentiable from the core text. Key results are not visually indicated. In general, visual aids are all but non-existent.

This may not be a problem for some, but I am most comfortable when I can visualize a concept, since I am terrible at remembering specific symbolic results and more proficient at categorizing results into a "visual summary" from which they can be recalled by mere intuition. Shankar's book is as distant from this style as can be achieved while still being classified as a textbook and not a transcript.

That is not to say that the book does not contain pictures! Visual aids include the simplest things like boxes, *visible* font size changes, summaries, consistent sectioning, whitespace patterns, lines, etc. None of which this title contains. The pictures themselves are sparse, and exist, it seems, only where absolutely necessary.

In summary, I would recommend that visual learners (or "rememberers") steer far away from this book. I wish I could recommend an alternative, but the QM book market is brimming, and I am seeking such a book myself (incidentally, if anybody has such a recommendation, feel free to post them in the comments of this review!).

Hopefully I can save some breath regarding my learning style, but there are a couple things I should add:

- I am willing to buy more than one book.
- I *love* pictures. Especially the useful kind. Graphs! See "visual complex analysis" (Needham) for my dream tome.
- I love math! I am not turned off by the "definition/theorem/lemma" bungaloo, but I prefer that as reference material over learning material, where, again, I prefer *pictures*!
- Excellent organization is an absolute must! Bra-ket notation from the get-go! I prefer the top-down approach (here's a state, this is how it can be represented) over the bottom-up approach (here's the Schrodinger equation... here's bra-ket notation... here's Heisenberg... this is how it pieces together).

There are way too many QM books out there for me to even know where to start! Amazon.com is too cluttered with groupthink, so excellent books sink to the bottom as soon as any momentum is gained.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
in the end there isn't necessarily such a book. i haven't considered specifically your requests but a good rule of thumb is that no book will match your learning style perfectly except for the book you write. of course you don't really need to write a book but that's the point of notes - to transform the material into a form that you'll be able to quickly reassimilate when you forget. about learning it in the first place: you just have to struggle, there are only minor differences between the books that are out there since qm is qm and there's a pedagogical tradition when it comes to teach it.
 
There does exist a pair of books by Bernd Thaller that uses animations to illustrate quantum theory,

Visual Quantum Mechanics: Selected Topics with Computer-Generated Animations of Quantum-Mechanical Phenomena,
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0387989293/?tag=pfamazon01-20,

Advanced Visual Quantum Mechanics,
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0387207775/?tag=pfamazon01-20.

I don't know if these books are what you're looking for, or if they can be used as substitutes for standard texts.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
For the following four books, has anyone used them in a course or for self study? Compiler Construction Principles and Practice 1st Edition by Kenneth C Louden Programming Languages Principles and Practices 3rd Edition by Kenneth C Louden, and Kenneth A Lambert Programming Languages 2nd Edition by Allen B Tucker, Robert E Noonan Concepts of Programming Languages 9th Edition by Robert W Sebesta If yes to either, can you share your opinions about your personal experience using them. I...
Hi, I have notice that Ashcroft, Mermin and Wei worked at a revised edition of the original solid state physics book (here). The book, however, seems to be never available. I have also read that the reason is related to some disputes related to copyright. Do you have any further information about it? Did you have the opportunity to get your hands on this revised edition? I am really curious about it, also considering that I am planning to buy the book in the near future... Thanks!
I’ve heard that in some countries (for example, Argentina), the curriculum is structured differently from the typical American program. In the U.S., students usually take a general physics course first, then move on to a textbook like Griffiths, and only encounter Jackson at the graduate level. In contrast, in those countries students go through a general physics course (such as Resnick-Halliday) and then proceed directly to Jackson. If the slower, more gradual approach is considered...

Similar threads

Back
Top