What is the Best Shape for a Hose Clamp to Provide Predictable Friction Loss?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bob_at_cw
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Friction Loss
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the optimal shape for a hose clamp to achieve consistent friction loss in the 1 to 2 psi range, specifically for hoses with diameters of 3 or 4 inches and flow rates between 10 to 50 gpm. Participants consider various designs, including a "venturi" shape and sudden contraction/expansion shapes, while noting that existing references often address minor losses rather than precise relationships. Suggestions include using an orifice plate, which can provide recoverable and unrecoverable pressure drop values. A recommended online calculator allows users to input specific parameters to estimate pressure drops for different configurations. The goal is to create a non-invasive device that effectively manages friction loss in fluid systems.
bob_at_cw
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I am researching the best shape for a hose clamp to provide a consistent and predictable friction loss in the 1 to 2 psi range. The hose diameter will be either 3 or 4 inches and the water flow will typically be in the range of 10 to 50 gpm. The idea is that the hose clamp can be finely adjusted to a set-point to provide the desired friction loss.

I've considered a "venturi" shape versus a sudden contraction/sudden expansion shape to provide flow characteristics that are predictable but most references that I have look at it from the standpoint of accounting for "minor losses" rather than defining a precise relationship.

My fluid mechanics skills are quite dusty at present and so I would like to see if anyone has any suggestions.

Thanks much.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
An orifice plate may be a good choice. There is a "recoverable" and "unrecoverable" pressure drop. There are many calculators available and most orifice plate manufacturers could also tell these two values.
 
Thank you for the excellent suggestion. I do, however, need for the device to be non-invasive to the hose.
 
OK, I see what you are trying to do.

Go to this website

http://pressure-drop.com/

Use the online calculation. Enter a "gradual contraction." I put in 30 gpm, and a 3" X 1.25" contraction with 45 deg angle, provides a 1.5 psi pressure drop.
 
Thanks edgepflow! - that is a great reference.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
Thread 'How can I find the cleanout for my building drain?'
I am a long distance truck driver, but I recently completed a plumbing program with Stratford Career Institute. In the chapter of my textbook Repairing DWV Systems, the author says that if there is a clog in the building drain, one can clear out the clog by using a snake augur or maybe some other type of tool into the cleanout for the building drain. The author said that the cleanout for the building drain is usually near the stack. I live in a duplex townhouse. Just out of curiosity, I...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
16K
Replies
2
Views
12K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Back
Top