Kindayr
- 159
- 0
I know that thinking a R-module is simply a ring R acting on a set (following the usual axioms), would it be safe to think of an R-algebra as the ring R acting on another ring?
This may seem convoluted, but I'm just having a little trouble getting through all the different definitions of an R-algebra.
This may seem convoluted, but I'm just having a little trouble getting through all the different definitions of an R-algebra.