What is the box in particle in a box?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mishima
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Box Particle
mishima
Messages
576
Reaction score
43
Hi, I am trying to demonstrate the relation between quantization of energy and wavelengths in a confined box for high school chemistry students. I am following an approach found in Atkins' "Chemical Principles". Anyways, its quite understandable, but I get the feeling maybe the box isn't actually what I think it is. I've been thinking of the box as the energy level (shell). But is it actually the orbital? Or something else entirely? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is this a bad question? I understand its just a model, but what is the box analogous to for say, an atom of hydrogen?
 
A one dimensional box is a potential V(x) which is infinite for e.g. x<0, zero for x>=0 and x<=L and again infinite for x>L.
It is not an energy level. The energies and orbitals arise when you solve the Schroedinger equation for a particle moving in that potential.
 
The box is really just a box: a volume with walls which are impenetrable for the particle. Although this is a valid approximation for some real physical systems, it is primarily a Gedankenexperiment which is easy to calculate and illustrates the behaviour of quantum mechanical systems. Especially, it is a quite bad model for atoms because they have no sharp boundary like the box.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top