What Is the Capacitance of a Homemade Parallel Plate Capacitor?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on estimating the capacitance of a homemade parallel plate capacitor made from aluminum foil and notebook paper. The formula for capacitance, C = e0 (A / d), is referenced, with participants noting the need for specific dimensions of the paper to calculate the capacitance accurately. One contributor suggests using the dimensions of standard notebook paper (8.5x11 inches) and its thickness (0.15 mm) for the estimation. The conversation reflects some frustration with the problem's ambiguity and the requirement for approximations. Ultimately, the capacitance is expected to be in the range of 10^-12 to 10^-5 farads, depending on the calculations made.
Evelima
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
1. Homework Statement [/b]

You make a parallel plate capacitor by using two sheets of aluminum foil, each the size of a
piece of notebook paper. The foil pieces are insulated from each other by a real piece of
notebook paper. The capacitance of this arrangment is approximatelya) 10ˆ–12

b) 10ˆ–8

c) 10ˆ–5

d) 10ˆ–22. Homework Equations [/b]

C = e0 (A / d)

3. The Attempt at a Solution [/b]

C = e0 (w x l)/d
I don't think this is what the question is asking though...
Im lost!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It looks as though they want you to estimate the capacitance. So you'll need to find out the dimensions of a piece of notebook paper, whatever "notebook size" is for your part of the world.
 
Looks like you were exactly correct to me. You just need some estimated numbers. e0 is proportional to 10^-12 then you could just guess at the ratio of the area to the distance.I guessed wrong but I looked it up for notebook paper 8.5x11" and thickness is 0.15 mm.

Kind of an annoying problem though...
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top