What is the Cation to Anion Ratio for Ionic Compounds?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the cation to anion ratio for various ionic compounds, including potassium chloride, calcium fluoride, aluminum oxide, calcium oxide, and strontium chloride. Participants clarify that cations are positively charged while anions are negatively charged, and the overall compound must remain neutral. The key to finding the ratios is to balance the charges of the cations and anions in each compound. The user expresses gratitude for the clarification and indicates understanding of the concept. Ultimately, the conversation emphasizes the importance of charge balance in ionic compounds.
Lou1024
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Hey everyone,
Im pretty terrible in Chemistry, and I am stuck on something that's probably easy and obvious:
Determine the ratio of cations to anions for the following ionic compounds.
a. Potassium chloride.
b. Calcium Fluoride.
c. Aluminum oxide
d. calcium oxide.
e. Strontium chloride.

If somone could provide me with some information on how I can come about the answers, It would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks,
Lou
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It would probably help to write out the chemicals like this instead,
KCl
CaF2
Al2O3
CaO
SrCl2

Cations have a positive charge, anions have a negative charge, over all, the compound has a neutral charge.
 
Last edited:
Yeh thanks, I think I figured it out.
 
yeah, just balance out the charges
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top