What is the Closure of a Proper Ideal in a Unital Banach Algebra?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fredrik
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    closure
Fredrik
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
Messages
10,876
Reaction score
423

Homework Statement



Prove that the closure of a proper ideal in a unital Banach algebra is a proper ideal.

Homework Equations



The hint is to use the result of the previous exercise: If I is an ideal in a unital normed algebra A, and I≠{0}, we have

I=A \Leftrightarrow I contains 1 \Leftrightarrow I contains an invertible element

The Attempt at a Solution



x is in the closure of I if and only if there's a sequence (xn) in I such that xn→x.

It's easy to show that the closure of I is closed under linear combinations:

\|(ax_n+by_n)-(ax+by)\|\leq |a|\|x_n-x\|+|b|\|y_n-y\|<\varepsilon

(I don't feel like typing every word of the argument. I'm assuming that it's obvious what I have in mind.).

It's also easy to show that if i is in the closure of I and x is in A, xi is in the closure of I:

\|xi_n-xi\|\leq \|x\|\|i_n-i\|<\varepsilon

These results imply that the closure is an ideal. What I don't see is how to prove that it's a proper ideal, i.e. that it's neither {0} nor A. The most straightforward approach seems to try to prove that 1 can't be a member, but I don't see how to do that. I'm probably missing something really obvious as usual.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Recall that the invertible elements of A form an open subset of A.
 
Thank you. That was all I needed to hear. That means that there's an open ball around 1 that's a subset of Ic, and that means that no sequence in I can have 1 as a limit. So 1 can't be a member of the closure.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top