What is the collaborative process behind CERN's particle result modeling?

  • B
  • Thread starter scienceboy1
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Cern Model
In summary, CERN models their particle results by taking measurements from collaborators all over the world and using these measurements to calculate the results.
  • #1
scienceboy1
2
0
Hi all,
I was wondering how CERN models their particle results as we see them in images.
As I understand it, Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle tells us that we are unable to precisely observe subatomic or fundamental particles, as the energy would cause its velocity or position to alter. How, then, can they precisely model the results of their experiments? What methods do they use?

Thanks in advance.

P.S. Apologies if any of my information is wrong, I'm still in high school so my knowledge is horrifyingly limited!
If I followed an incorrect format or posted in the wrong section, please let me know - this is my first time here.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Alex Lehm said:
I was wondering how CERN models their particle results as we see them in images.
Which images? Event displays like these?
The uncertainty relation is completely negligible for these tracks - less than the size of an atom while the pictures show tracks with lengths of meters. The measurement uncertainties of the detectors is many orders of magnitude larger than the fundamental limit given by the uncertainty principle.

The measurement uncertainty of the detectors can be a challenge for the experiments. As an example, if you reconstruct the decay of a Higgs boson to two photons, you use the measured properties of the photons to calculate the Higgs boson mass. A hypothetical perfect detector would always get the same value within ~0.004% (the natural uncertainty of this value), in practice the measurements vary by about 1%. That makes it harder to see an excess of events at the Higgs mass - you need much larger datasets than you would with a "perfect" detector. Here is an example graph and some more details.
 
  • Like
Likes Imager, vanhees71, dlgoff and 1 other person
  • #3
mfb said:
Which images? Event displays Like these?
The uncertainty relation is completely negligible for these tracks - less than the size of an atom while the pictures show tracks with lengths of meters. The measurement uncertainties of the detectors is many orders of magnitude larger than the fundamental limit given by the uncertainty principle.

The measurement uncertainty of the detectors can be a challenge for the experiments. As an example, if you reconstruct the decay of a Higgs boson to two photons, you use the measured properties of the photons to calculate the Higgs boson mass. A hypothetical perfect detector would always get the same value within ~0.004% (the natural uncertainty of this value), in practice the measurements vary by about 1%. That makes it harder to see an excess of events at the Higgs mass - you need much larger datasets than you would with a "perfect" detector. Here is an example graph and some more details.

Thank you
 
  • #4
Alex Lehm said:
Hi all,
I was wondering how CERN models their particle results as we see them in images.

Since you're still in high school, then there is also another thing that you should learn. The work being done at CERN are not done only by CERN employees. All of the major scientific efforts at CERN (and at Fermilab, NASA, Super Kamiokande, etc...) are done by collaborators from institutions all over the world. Look at this, for example:

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1808.00336.pdf

Scroll down and look at the institutions that are represented within the "ATLAS collaboration". What percentage of these people are actually working for CERN directly?

I'm pointing this out because a lot of people, especially outside of physics and those who are still in high school, often do not realize that major scientific projects, while done under the banner of one organization, are often done by people from all over the world. You do not need to be working for CERN to work AT CERN. This applies to all the user facilities at various major scientific laboratories all around the world.

This is a very common misconception, and I thought that this is a good opportunity to highlight it since it is obviously happening here.

Zz.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71, odietrich, mfb and 1 other person

1. How does CERN use simulation for their results?

CERN uses advanced computer simulations to model the behavior of subatomic particles in their experiments. This allows them to predict and analyze the results of their experiments before they are actually performed.

2. What software does CERN use for their simulations?

CERN primarily uses software called GEANT4 for their simulations. This software is specifically designed for modeling the interactions of particles with matter and is widely used in the scientific community.

3. How accurate are the results from CERN's simulations?

The accuracy of CERN's simulation results depends on various factors such as the complexity of the experiment and the accuracy of the input data. However, CERN's simulations are generally considered to be very accurate and have been validated by numerous experiments.

4. What are the advantages of using simulations for CERN's experiments?

Using simulations allows CERN to test different scenarios and parameters for their experiments without the need for costly and time-consuming physical experiments. It also helps them to better understand the behavior of particles and make more accurate predictions.

5. How does CERN ensure the validity of their simulation results?

CERN employs a rigorous validation process for their simulation results, which involves comparing the results with data from actual experiments and peer-reviewed research. They also continuously improve and update their software to ensure the accuracy of their simulations.

Similar threads

  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
2
Views
959
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
2
Replies
36
Views
1K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
8
Views
978
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
2
Replies
49
Views
9K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
924
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top