What is the composition of the crust and atmosphere on a neutron star?

AI Thread Summary
Neutron stars lack electrons in their core, as they combine with protons to form neutrons. The surface gravity is approximately 10^11 times that of Earth, and the magnetic field can reach 10^12 Gauss, significantly altering atomic structures. The upper crust primarily consists of iron-56 and lighter elements, while deeper layers contain heavier elements due to extreme pressure. At densities around 4x10^11 g/cm^3, neutrons begin to "drip" out of nuclei, leading to a region dominated by free neutrons, protons, and electrons. The crust is about 1 km thick and consists of electron-degenerate iron, with a plasma atmosphere above it.
Jimmy Snyder
Messages
1,122
Reaction score
22
There aren't any electrons on a neutron star right? They all get squooshed into the protons to make the neutrons. Am I right about that?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
http://www.astro.umd.edu/~miller/nstar.html

Anyway, imagine starting at the surface of a neutron star and burrowing your way down. The surface gravity is about 10^11 times Earth's, and the magnetic field is about 10^12 Gauss, which is enough to completely mess up atomic structure: for example, the ground state binding energy of hydrogen rises to 160 eV in a 10^12 Gauss field, versus 13.6 eV in no field. In the atmosphere and upper crust, you have lots of nuclei, so it isn't primarily neutrons yet. At the top of the crust, the nuclei are mostly iron 56 and lighter elements, but deeper down the pressure is high enough that the equilibrium atomic weights rise, so you might find Z=40, A=120 elements eventually. At densities of 10^6 g/cm^3 the electrons become degenerate, meaning that electrical and thermal conductivities are huge because the electrons can travel great distances before interacting.

Deeper yet, at a density around 4x10^11 g/cm^3, you reach the "neutron drip" layer. At this layer, it becomes energetically favorable for neutrons to float out of the nuclei and move freely around, so the neutrons "drip" out. Even further down, you mainly have free neutrons, with a 5%-10% sprinkling of protons and electrons.
 
Thanks Bobbywhy. Your answer is far more interesting than I had figured on. What prompted my question was this quote from the book "QFT III: Gauge Theory" by Eberhard Zeidler, page 950.

Eberhard Zeidler said:
fermions of the same type (e.g., the electrons in a neutron star) are governed by the Fermi-Dirac statistics

If it were me, I would have said electrons in an atom.
 
It is indeed interesting. Beyond the neutron drip density, neutrons tend to clump together. This is analogous to the reason why a water drop likes forming a sphere. So we get bubbles of neutrons floating in otherwise neutron-rich nuclei. As we go deeper we encounter other phases, what are sometimes called "nuclear pasta," before getting to the regime where neutrons dominate. Near the core, there will be more than 10 neutrons for every proton.

http://relativity.livingreviews.org/Articles/lrr-2008-10/

Section 3.3 describes this series of phase transitions and has some pretty pictures.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Jimmy Snyder said:
There aren't any electrons on a neutron star right? They all get squooshed into the protons to make the neutrons. Am I right about that?

According to most sources, it appears that neutron stars have a crust of electron degenerate iron about 1km thick (with an outer & inner crust) and a plasma atmosphere.

A couple of sources-
http://arxiv.org/abs/0705.2708v2
http://var.astro.cz/brno/perseus4_2002_clanek2.pdf
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top