What is the Correct Concentration of Sr2+ in a Saturated SrSO4 Solution?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jimbo57
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Concentration
AI Thread Summary
In a saturated SrSO4 solution with a sulfate concentration of 1.0x10-4M, the expected strontium concentration is debated. The answer key indicates that the concentration of Sr2+ is 3.4x10-3M, but the 1:1 molar ratio suggests it should be 1.0x10-4M. The ambiguity arises from the lack of provided Ksp value, which is essential for calculating the correct concentration of Sr2+. The discussion highlights the importance of complete information in solving such chemistry problems. Clarification on Ksp is necessary for accurate determination of strontium concentration.
Jimbo57
Messages
96
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A saturated solution of SrSO4 has a [SO42-] of 1.0x10-4M. What is the [Sr2+]?

A. 3.4x10-3M
B. 5.8x10-4M
C. 1.0x10-4M
D. 3.4x10-7M

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



It's a multiple choice practice test and the answer key tells me that A is the answer. When I look at the question, the strontium and sulphate have a 1:1 molar ratio so wouldn't the answer be C? Is this a mistake or am I missing something?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Saturated solution doesn't have to be produced by putting SrSO4 in water, it can be produced by other means (like dropping some SrSO4 into sulfuirc acid). Then concentration of Sr2+ needs to be calculated from Ksp. I guess you were given Ksp somewhere else. But I agree question is ambiguous.
 
Thanks for the help Borek! Turns out they forgot to supply the ksp value.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top