What Is the Correct Method to Calculate W and Alpha in Planar Kinematics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter smruthi92
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Kinematic
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating angular velocity (w) and angular acceleration (alpha) in planar kinematics. The user attempts to apply the equation aA = w² AO en + alpha AO et but encounters difficulties in determining w and alpha. They express confusion about calculating alpha without a differentiable equation and seek clarification on the process. It is suggested that w can be derived as a function of theta by analyzing the linear velocity component perpendicular to AO. The conversation emphasizes the need for a clear method to compute these kinematic parameters.
smruthi92
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
pls see attached file.

so i thought i could use this eqn:

aA = w2 AO en + alpha AO et

but when i try to work out w, something goes wrong. i do:

w = 7.16605 (normal velocity i found by having the given velocity as a y coordinate one, then resolving for normal/tangential) / 0.25. but this itself is wrong. what have i done? also how do i calculate alpha? i have no IDEA how to do it!

thanks a lot for ur help,
cheers,
s.
 

Attachments

  • physics.jpg
    physics.jpg
    30.9 KB · Views: 476
Physics news on Phys.org
alpha is the angular acceleration, or the rate of change of w w.r.t. time.

Tell me if you get stuck.
 
yeh but how do i calculate it with the data given? we haven't been given an equation to differentiate to find alpha. also I am still stuck on calculating w.
 
w is the angular velocity, or the rate of change of theta w.r.t time.

If you find w as a function of theta you can differentiate w.r.t time.

You can find w as a function of theta by considering the component of the linear velocity of the pin which is perpendicular to AO.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top