What Is the Correct Name for This Animatronic Eye Mechanism Part?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Wyatt_Rocks
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Eye Mechanism
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on identifying a specific part of an animatronic eye mechanism. The original poster is seeking help to name the part, which they believe may be a ball-socket or universal joint coupling. Participants confirm that the correct term is indeed "universal joint." The conversation includes a video link for reference, and the community expresses appreciation for the helpful input. Ultimately, the original poster successfully identifies the part as a universal joint.
Wyatt_Rocks
Messages
3
Reaction score
1
Hello All. I'm searching for this part and also have video footage of it in motion. I cannot find it to finish the eye mechanism because I don't know what it's called. Can anyone tell me what it is? I would greatly appreciate it. Even companies dealing in such parts as well as metal fittings have steered me wrong. Thanks in advance.
Animatronic%20eye%20sample.jpg


video link: start at 35 second mark.
 
  • Like
Likes 256bits
Engineering news on Phys.org
I would think it is some kind of ball-socket coupling, or universal joint coupling.

What are you calling it?

Nice video by the way.
 
  • Like
Likes Wyatt_Rocks
256bits said:
I would think it is some kind of ball-socket coupling, or universal joint coupling.

What are you calling it?

Nice video by the way.
Thank you! That's it!
 
Thread 'How can I find the cleanout for my building drain?'
I am a long distance truck driver, but I recently completed a plumbing program with Stratford Career Institute. In the chapter of my textbook Repairing DWV Systems, the author says that if there is a clog in the building drain, one can clear out the clog by using a snake augur or maybe some other type of tool into the cleanout for the building drain. The author said that the cleanout for the building drain is usually near the stack. I live in a duplex townhouse. Just out of curiosity, I...
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
Back
Top