MHB What is the correct probability for P(3<X<4|X>1)?

Yankel
Messages
390
Reaction score
0
Hello, I have this question, which I think I solve correctly, but I am getting the wrong answer.

X represent the point that the computer chooses on a scale of 2 to 5 (continuous scale) in a non-uniform way using the density:

f(x)=C*(1+x)

what is the probability P(3<X<4|X>1) ?

I solved the integral from 2 to 5 to find that C=2/27

Then using this value I did conditional probability P(3<X<4)/P(X>1). The nominator was 1/3 and the denominator was 32/27, my final result is then 9/32. The answer I have with the question is 9/27. Which one is wrong then ? Can you assist me please? Thank you in advance !
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have

$$\displaystyle c\times \int_2^5 x+1 ~dx = 1$$

$$\displaystyle c\times \left[ \frac{x^2}{2}+x\right]_2^5 = 1$$

$$\displaystyle c\times \left(\left[ \frac{5^2}{2}+5\right]-\left[ \frac{2^2}{2}+2\right]\right) = 1$$

$$\displaystyle c\times \left(\left[ 12.5+5\right]-\left[ 2+2\right]\right) = 1$$

$$\displaystyle c\times \left(\left[ 17.5\right]-\left[ 4\right]\right) = 1$$

$$\displaystyle c = \frac{1}{13.5} = \frac{2}{27}$$
 
Yankel said:
Hello, I have this question, which I think I solve correctly, but I am getting the wrong answer.

X represent the point that the computer chooses on a scale of 2 to 5 (continuous scale) in a non-uniform way using the density:

f(x)=C*(1+x)

what is the probability P(3<X<4|X>1) ?

I solved the integral from 2 to 5 to find that C=2/27

Then using this value I did conditional probability P(3<X<4)/P(X>1). The nominator was 1/3 and the denominator was 32/27, my final result is then 9/32. The answer I have with the question is 9/27. Which one is wrong then ? Can you assist me please? Thank you in advance !

Hi Yankel,

I got the same thing for $C$ and the same numerator since $P([3<X<4] \cap [X>1])=P(3<X<4)$. For the denominator though it seems like you used this integral:
$$ \frac{2}{27} \int_{1}^{5} (1+x) \, dx = \frac{32}{27}$$
Remember though that any probability must be between 0 and 1, so this isn't a valid answer. The small mistake comes from the fact that $P(X<2)=0$ and $P(X>5)=0$, so $P(X>1)=P(2<X<5)=1$. For some reason the book chose to write the answer as 9/27 instead of 1/3, but those are equivalent answers. :)
 
Oh...how did I miss this...typing numbers without thinking (Doh)

thanks !
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.

Similar threads

Back
Top