What is the Correct Radius of a Brass Rod Given Its Mass and Density?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 7starmantis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Radius Rod
AI Thread Summary
To determine the radius of a brass rod with a density of 8470 kg/m3, a length of 12 cm, and a weight of 20 N, the volume is calculated using the formula volume = mass/density. The mass is derived from the weight, leading to a volume of approximately 2.4 x 10^-4 m^3. The area is then found using the relationship area = volume/length, resulting in an area of 0.002 m^2. The radius is calculated from the area using the formula A = πr^2, yielding a radius of 0.03 m. The discussion clarifies the correct application of formulas and confirms the solution.
7starmantis
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Radius Problem

A brass rod (density = 8470 kg/m3) is 12cm long and weighs 20N. What is the radius of the rod?
I'm confused when finding area. I don't think I'm using the right variables.
volume = mass/density
v = 2.04 kg / 8470 kg/m3 = 2.4X10^-4

Area = volume/length?
A = 2.4X10^-4 / .12m = .002m
A = pi r^2
r = .03m
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Area is measured in m^2

And where did you have any troubles? Just do unit analysis to make yourself sure.
 
Yeah I forgot to complete the area units, sorry.
I didn't think area = volume / length was the right equation.
If it is then I have the right answer already, right?
 
7starmantis said:
Yeah I forgot to complete the area units, sorry.
I didn't think area = volume / length was the right equation.
If it is then I have the right answer already, right?

ok, then I see. Yes the volume of a cylinder / rod is area x lenght.
 
Ah, then I just questioned myself for no reason. I already had the correct answer.

Correct?
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top