What is the correct spring constant for the bungee cord?

AI Thread Summary
To find the correct spring constant for the bungee cord, the gravitational potential energy must be equated to the elastic potential energy of the cord. The initial calculation of 210 N/m is incorrect because it fails to account for the ongoing conversion of gravitational potential energy to elastic potential energy as the cord stretches. The correct approach involves considering the total energy at different points, specifically setting the reference point for gravitational potential at Sam's lowest point. By doing so, the negative gravitational potential when the cord is fully stretched must be included in the calculations. This method ensures an accurate determination of the spring constant.
TyErd
Messages
297
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The natural length of the bungee cord is 10m
Sam stops falling and first comes to rest momentarily when the length of the bungee cord is 18metres. Height of the tower was calculated to be 19.6metres

What is the spring constant of the bungee cord?


Homework Equations


mgh
0.5kx^2


The Attempt at a Solution


after free falling 10metres the gravitational potential would be 70*10*9.6=6720. then equate that to 0.5kx^2, so 6720=0.5k*8^2, thus k=210N/m.
I was absolutely confident my solution was correct but turns out it isnt.
 

Attachments

  • spring constant problem.JPG
    spring constant problem.JPG
    33.8 KB · Views: 449
Physics news on Phys.org
Hey there, I'm not sure if I'm qualified to help you, but I'll try my best.

It seems you are trying to equate the potential elastic energy of the bungee cord when it is fully stretched with Sam's potential gravitational energy from when he is at the top of the tower with respect to when the cord starts stretching. I believe your answer is wrong because Sam is still converting gravitational potential to elastic potential as the cord is stretching. If you add that little bit you should get the right answer. Just remember:

When equating...
Eg = Ee

You are actually equating...
Etotal1 = Etotal2
Eg1 + Ee1 = Eg2 + Ee2

But at the very top of the tower, Ee1 = 0, and at Sam's lowest point Eg2 = 0 so...
Eg1 = Ee2

Bear in mind that this only holds true if you set your "zero" (Point of reference for gravitational potential) at Sam's lowest point on his jump. Since you set your point of reference at the point where the cord begins stretching, you need to account for the "negative" gravitational potential that Sam owes to your point of reference when the cord is fully stretched because he has gone past that point.

Hope this helps!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top