What is the correct wavelength of the light provided by the laser?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the wavelength of light from a laser using the double-slit interference pattern. The initial calculation yielded a wavelength of 319.4 nm, but this was deemed incorrect according to the mark scheme, which indicated the correct wavelength is 639 nm. The confusion stemmed from the interpretation of fringe orders; the participants clarified that the calculation should consider bright fringe to bright fringe, not bright to dark. This distinction is crucial because the dark fringe is positioned halfway between the bright fringes, leading to a halved result if not accounted for. Ultimately, the correct wavelength calculation confirms that the proper approach involves using the bright fringe to bright fringe distance.
vanceEE
Messages
109
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


In Fig. 6.1 the distance from the two slits to the screen is 1.8 m. The distance CP is
2.3 mm and the distance between the slits is 0.25 mm.
Calculate the wavelength of the light provided by the laser.

Homework Equations


$$asinθ = nλ$$
$$w = \frac{λD}{a}$$

The Attempt at a Solution


$$θ = tan^{-1}(\frac{2.3×10^{-3}}{1.8}) = 0.0732°$$
Since P is first order, n = 1.
$$ λ = (0.25×10^-3)(sin(0.0732°)) = 319.4 nm $$

According to the mark scheme it is incorrect:
$$ λ = ax / D $$
$$ = \frac{2 × 2.3 × 10^{–3} × 0.25 ×10^{–3}}{1.8} $$
$$ = 639 nm $$Why must I multiply my wavelength by two?
 

Attachments

  • Double Slit.jpg
    Double Slit.jpg
    25.4 KB · Views: 535
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It's because that equation is for B to C (according to your diagram) not C to P. Or, in other words, bright fringe to bright fringe. Since, the dark fringe is halfway between the bright fringes, you get half the result.
 
rpthomps said:
It's because that equation is for B to C (according to your diagram) not C to P. Or, in other words, bright fringe to bright fringe. Since, the dark fringe is halfway between the bright fringes, you get half the result.

$$ θ = tan^{-1}(\frac{|CB|}{1.8}) = tan^{-1}(\frac{4.6*10^{-3}}{1.8}) = 0.1464° $$
B is 2nd order, hence n = 2.
$$(0.25*10^{-3})sin(0.1464°) = 2λ$$
$$λ = \frac{(0.25*10^{-3})sin(0.1464°)}{2} = 319.4 nm$$

Please explain; I am still getting the same wavelength.
 
Are the bright fringe to bright fringe considered to be 1st order? For example, would the middle-fringe (green) be zero and the first two greens on the top and bottom of the middle fringe be considered first order?
http://h2physics.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/young2a.jpg

If so, then the equation would in fact be:
$$(0.25*10^{-3})sin(0.1464°) = λ$$
= 639 nm
Right?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
vanceEE said:
$$ θ = tan^{-1}(\frac{|CB|}{1.8}) = tan^{-1}(\frac{4.6*10^{-3}}{1.8}) = 0.1464° $$
B is 2nd order, hence n = 2.
$$(0.25*10^{-3})sin(0.1464°) = 2λ$$
$$λ = \frac{(0.25*10^{-3})sin(0.1464°)}{2} = 319.4 nm$$

Please explain; I am still getting the same wavelength.

It looks first order to me(1st bright fringe to the center). I would use the equation:

$$λ=\frac{mx_md}{L}$$ where

x_m is the distance from the center to the first bright fringe
m is the order (in this case 1)
This gives you your answer.
 
vanceEE said:
Are the bright fringe to bright fringe considered to be 1st order? For example, would the middle-fringe (green) be zero and the first two greens on the top and bottom of the middle fringe be considered first order?

If so, then the equation would in fact be:
$$(0.25*10^{-3})sin(0.1464°) = λ$$
= 639 nm
Right?

Yes. You were thinking bright fringe to dark fringe is one order but in fact it is bright to bright. This is why you are getting half of what you should have got.
 
rpthomps said:
Yes. You were thinking bright fringe to dark fringe is one order but in fact it is bright to bright. This is why you are getting half of what you should have got.

Ok, thanks for the help!
 
Back
Top