What Is the Decibel Level After Removing 69 Pigs?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bdh1613
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Change
bdh1613
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The noise level coming from a pig pen with 176 pigs is 73 dB. Assuming each of the remaining pigs squeal at their original level after 69 of their companions have been removed, what is the decibel level of the remaining pigs?
Answer in units of dB.

Homework Equations



I= P/A
B=10dbLog(Is/Io)

The Attempt at a Solution



I was thinking that the ratio of the intensities would be equal to the change in the number of pigs.

73dB - x = 10Log(69)

I found that x= 54.61150909db.
However this was wrong.
I did a similar problem to this regarding people were a single person can speak at 65dB. The question asked how many people does it take to reach 78dB. In that particular problem the ratio was equal to the number of people. I think this was the case because we had a base value for what a single person could produce. In the problem with the pigs there isn't necessarily a based value for dB. Where am I going wrong in my approach? I spelled decibels wrong in the title, my bad.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
SOLVED

I realized what I was doing wrong. The logarithmic is defining two intensities that are comparing values. The reason that the comparison was equal to the number of people was because that it was 20people to 1 person. In the case of the pigs the comparison is not equal to 69, rather it is equal to 176/107.This is how it looks

73 -x = 10Log(176/107)

x=70.8387111dB
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top