What is the definition of "free fall"?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the definition of "free fall" in the context of gravitational forces acting on an object. Participants explore the nuances of what constitutes free fall, particularly focusing on the role of gravity as the sole force acting on the object.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants question whether gravity should be considered singular or plural, and if the gravitational force from all bodies in the universe affects the definition of free fall. There are attempts to clarify the implications of gravity being the only force acting on an object in free fall, with discussions on the relative insignificance of other gravitational forces.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with various interpretations being explored regarding the definition of free fall. Some participants have provided clarifications that emphasize the singular nature of gravity in the context of free fall, while others have acknowledged the complexity of gravitational interactions without reaching a consensus.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the definition as presented in a textbook, which is in Swedish, leading to questions about the translation and interpretation of the term "gravity." There is also mention of the theoretical implications of personal gravitational forces on the concept of free fall.

Viktor Haugland
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
1.
"An object is in "free fall" when the only force acting upon it is gravity".


2.
Is gravity in this case singular or plural?
Is the acting gravity the resultant force of all bodies in the universe?


3.
In theory, my own bodys gravitational force is acting on the object and thus it's not acually a free fall.
My teacher just says "no, read the definition of "free fall" in the textbook".
But it's in swedish and gravity is written like "the gravity", like it's a single force.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're chasing your tail here. The force due to gravity is inversely proportional to the distance between the body falling and any other bodies nearby.

F = Gm1m2 / r2

Now, as an exercise, you can calculate the force of gravity between a falling mass of say, 1 kg, and you, and the earth, and the moon, and the sun, and whatever else you can think of. If you rank all of these various forces by magnitude, I think you'll see that the Earth exerts the major influence on this falling body, and the forces exerted by all of these other bodies are insignificant.
 
It would seem that that definition of freefall does indeed imply that gravity is the attractive force between all bodies, not just a body and the earth.
 
Look at it this way: gravity is singular. If the only force acting is gravity, that's free fall. Now the cause of that gravity force can be one single body or a whole lot of them, but that doesn't matter.

Example: some point between Earth and moon. Closer to the moon: free fall towards the moon. Closer to earth: free fall towards the earth. And there is a point where you're not accelerating wrt either of them. All three can be considered free fall (in the last case it'll just take a very, very long time before the fall ends :smile:.

Likewise, in SK's case, all the little forces may be insignificant, but that is not the point: they all originate from gravity, so it's free fall.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: AlephNumbers
BvU said:
Likewise, in SK's case, all the little forces may be insignificant, but that is not the point: they all originate from gravity, so it's free fall.
This was exactly the kind of answer i was looking for. Thank you!
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
797
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K