What is the definition of "free fall"?

AI Thread Summary
An object is in "free fall" when gravity is the only force acting on it, regardless of other gravitational influences. The discussion highlights that while other bodies exert gravitational forces, they are often negligible compared to the primary force from Earth. The definition of free fall remains valid even when considering multiple gravitational sources, as the resultant force is still gravity. The conversation emphasizes that free fall can occur toward any massive body, depending on the object's position. Ultimately, the key point is that free fall is defined by the absence of other forces aside from gravity.
Viktor Haugland
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
1.
"An object is in "free fall" when the only force acting upon it is gravity".


2.
Is gravity in this case singular or plural?
Is the acting gravity the resultant force of all bodies in the universe?


3.
In theory, my own bodys gravitational force is acting on the object and thus it's not acually a free fall.
My teacher just says "no, read the definition of "free fall" in the textbook".
But it's in swedish and gravity is written like "the gravity", like it's a single force.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're chasing your tail here. The force due to gravity is inversely proportional to the distance between the body falling and any other bodies nearby.

F = Gm1m2 / r2

Now, as an exercise, you can calculate the force of gravity between a falling mass of say, 1 kg, and you, and the earth, and the moon, and the sun, and whatever else you can think of. If you rank all of these various forces by magnitude, I think you'll see that the Earth exerts the major influence on this falling body, and the forces exerted by all of these other bodies are insignificant.
 
It would seem that that definition of freefall does indeed imply that gravity is the attractive force between all bodies, not just a body and the earth.
 
Look at it this way: gravity is singular. If the only force acting is gravity, that's free fall. Now the cause of that gravity force can be one single body or a whole lot of them, but that doesn't matter.

Example: some point between Earth and moon. Closer to the moon: free fall towards the moon. Closer to earth: free fall towards the earth. And there is a point where you're not accelerating wrt either of them. All three can be considered free fall (in the last case it'll just take a very, very long time before the fall ends :smile:.

Likewise, in SK's case, all the little forces may be insignificant, but that is not the point: they all originate from gravity, so it's free fall.
 
  • Like
Likes AlephNumbers
BvU said:
Likewise, in SK's case, all the little forces may be insignificant, but that is not the point: they all originate from gravity, so it's free fall.
This was exactly the kind of answer i was looking for. Thank you!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top