What is the density of the life preserver?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the density of a life preserver that supports an 80kg person in seawater. The user has converted specific gravities to weight densities and applied various formulas related to buoyancy and density. They are attempting to find the mass of the preserver by equating the force of buoyancy to the combined weight of the person and the preserver. The calculations involve using the weight density of seawater and the volume of the preserver to derive the necessary values. The user seeks confirmation on their approach and encourages others to share their work for clarity.
AoshiShinomori
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
This one got me.
Any help?
Regardless of if its being homework, respond if you can.

A life preserver with a volume of .05m^3 will support a 80kg person with a specific gravity of .92, in seawater, specific gravity of 1.03, the person is 20% above water(volume-wise) and the preserver is fully submerged, find the density of the life preserver.

Okay, well so far, I took all of the specific gravities and changed them to weight densities. Therefore, I had seawater as 10094 N/m^3 (not working in lb/ft^3), the human as 9016, and of course, pure water is9800. I took the 9800 and multiplied through all the specifics to get there weight densities. Some formulae I've pulled together include:

9800*specific gravity=weight density
Pressure=weighdensity*height (irrelevant)
Force Buoyancy=Force Weight - Force Apparent (where Fb is weight of fluid displaced, naturally)
Specific gravity*1000=density of certain solution
Density=mass/volume(...)
Force Buoyancy=(Volume of object)(weight density of fluid)

Anyways, given the volume, we need to find the mass of the preserver. Since the preserver is just submerged, the 80kg person, plus the mass of the raft caused the force weight to equal the force buoyancy (may be off).

Using the latter of the equations, I took the weight density of the seawater, which was 9800*1.03 and multiplied that by the volume of the buoyant preserver, which, I used to equal force weight plus the mass of the raft(which I'm guessing is force b...it should be anyway). Solved for Mass...and plugged into mass/volume=density. Is that right? Let's just say that was the bonus, and he didn't put a correct answer down...

In numerical format...(9800)(1.03)(.05)=(80*9.8 +/-(?) x(mass of raft)*9.8)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Cute problem,any ideas...??

Daniel.

PS.Post your work.
 
I went ahead and edited the original with all my work. I wouldn't have posted, but I didn't want anyone to think I hadn't done the work.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top