What is the Difference Between Escape Velocity and Orbit Velocity?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Badger01
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Escape Velocity
AI Thread Summary
Escape velocity is the speed needed for an object to break free from a planet's gravitational pull, calculated using the equation GMm/r = 1/2 mv². In contrast, orbital velocity refers to the speed required for an object to maintain a stable circular orbit around the planet, which is derived from the centripetal force equation F = mv²/r. The confusion arises in distinguishing these two velocities, as escape velocity is greater than orbital velocity. Specifically, escape velocity applies to an object leaving the planet's surface, while orbital velocity pertains to an object in a circular path at a given radius. Understanding these concepts is crucial for grasping the dynamics of motion in gravitational fields.
Badger01
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
"Given a planet has mass M and radius R, find the speed it would have to be launched at. Compare this to the speed required to put the object in the circular orbit."

I understand the first half where Ep=Ek
i.e: GMm/r = 1/2 mv2
rearrange to find v

how ever, I'm unsure of what exactly the 'orbit velocity' is.
is the the value of v in centripetal force, F = mv2/r
is this the same as the speed needed to launch it into orbit or what? i am rather stumped here..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem statement is a bit confusing. I suppose it could be asking you to compare the escape velocity for an object leaving the planet's surface (planet radius R) to the velocity of a hypothetical object orbiting the planet at the planet's surface. Obviously one would have to ignore the problem of terrain variations, such as mountains!

To answer your query, yes, the orbital velocity is the speed of the object along its orbital path. So it is indeed the 'v' in mv2/r.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top