What is the difference between Kinetic energy and momentum of a moving body?

AI Thread Summary
Kinetic energy and momentum are distinct concepts in physics, despite both being related to motion. Momentum is defined as a vector quantity, represented mathematically as mass times velocity, while kinetic energy is a scalar quantity, calculated as one-half mass times velocity squared. The key difference lies in their conservation laws; momentum is always conserved in isolated systems, whereas kinetic energy may not be conserved due to transformations into other energy forms. Additionally, momentum has directional components, allowing for vector operations, while energy is always a positive scalar. Understanding these differences is crucial for analyzing physical systems accurately.
gdpudasaini
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
Hi everybody! I was thinking about the difference between Kinetic energy and momentum of a body. According to Newton; Momentum is the quantity of motion i.e. momentum is the measure of motion. And Kinetic energy is the energy of motion of a moving body...Now i am confused; The above two definations of momentum and kinetic energy seems to say same thing. Then what is the difference between Kinetic energy and momentum of a moving body? Please can anybody explain me...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's best to look at the "mathematical" definitions of momentum and kinetic energy to see the difference. And btw, the "quantity of motion" is definitely not the same thing as the "energy of motion".
 
The biggest difference is that momentum is a vector with units of ML/T and kinetic energy is a scalar with units of ML²/T².
 
radou said:
It's best to look at the "mathematical" definitions of momentum and kinetic energy to see the difference. And btw, the "quantity of motion" is definitely not the same thing as the "energy of motion".

Its very easy to understand the difference if we look at mathematical equations. But what i want here is the way to visulaize them in a conceptual way..
 
In short, kinetic energy may be transformed into some other type of energy (electrical, potential...).
Momentum can't be transformed in anything else.

This means that an isolated system always conserves momentum (if you plot momentum versus time it will be a constant), but may or may not conserve kinetic energy (the plot kinetic energy versus time can be anything (of course, always a non-negative value, but besides that, there's no other restriction)).

I'm NOT saying energy isn't conserved. If you plot TOTAL energy (kinetic + potential + whatever other type of energy) of an isolated system, it will always be a constant, if you neglect any relativistic stuff (in which energy may be converted to mass and vice-versa, but if you include it in the "whatever" part, you get your energy conservation back).

Another important diff: momentum is a vector. It has x, y, z components, may be coordinate transformed, you may do vector products with it. Energy is a positive scalar, no components.

The time derivative of momentum is Force (Force is always a vector). The time derivative of energy will give you the power of a system (power is always a scalar).
 
gdpudasaini said:
what is the difference between Kinetic energy and momentum of a moving body?

Momentum, like energy, has many forms in nature. As for the difference between the two, a specific example may be instructive. A spherical shell of charge, which has always moved at a constant, low (<<c) speed, has an electromagnetic field characterized by both momentum and energy densities. If the momentum density is integrated over all of space, one obtains a vector result that equals a constant (the shell's "electromagnetic mass") times the shell's velocity. If the magnetic field energy is integrated over all of space, one obtains a scalar result equal to the electromagnetic mass times v*v/2. The field momentum equals part of the force, required to accelerate the charge from rest, multiplied by the time the force acts. (The other part is found in a radiation field). The energy (in the magnetic field) equals part of the force, required to accelerate the charge from rest, multiplied by the distance through which the force acts. These two quantities, while related, have their own particular units and are distinct for this reason, plus the fact that the momentum is a vector quantity, whereas the energy is a scalar. The unit of energy is the joule. It's high time someone gave the unit of momentum a name.
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top